Hi Team
Looking for someone from Mailchimp as logged some tickets via the abuse
helpdesk but haven't heard back.
Thanks in advance
Toshi
--
*Toshiaki Onishi*
Email Operations Specialist | *GROUPON*
mobile +61 404 882 045
toni...@groupon.com
___
mai
That hetzner.de (or whatever host owns the equipment) is leasing
hardware+connectivity in one bundle, and possibly the OS, leaving their
customer is fully in control of the machine and the host has no day to day
administrative duties or responsibilities.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017, at 16:52, Tim Sta
Then what does "unmanaged" mean in this context?
-Tim
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> As far as #2, because users of said servers often want to send email.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017, at 12:05, Tim Starr wrote:
>
> An overall admirable response, keep up the good work. Just
Hello,
SendGrid has a client who is also using an IP on google's network. This IP
is blacklisted on an SBL.
Does anyone know how to get google's attention to reach out about a
Spamhaus SBL?
Thanks for everyones time and help!
Ryan
___
mailop mailing
> Hi, we're looking for recommendations for an antispam service we can
> layer in front of our hosted IMAP offering.
> We've tried a few services so far and our testing has found serious
> deficiencies.
We are using PreciseMail from Process (http://www.process.com).
It works as a proxy SMTP se
I don't know how much of this is fictional or the order of exact
operations...
but you've admitted your server got hacked and then we blocked your mail.
A good percentage of the spam we receive is from hacked boxes, and these
boxes can send millions of messages in the minutes after being hacked.
On 07/18/2017 10:02 AM, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
Value add
Are you looking to have the appliance handle all email and only filter
some of it (value add subscribers)?
Or will you be doing something in front of the appliance to sort
value-add and non-value-add?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
Michael Peddemors wrote:
> Spam detection usually comes in via SMTP, not IMAP ;)
>
I get that, but somebody asked me offlist what our IMAP implementation
looked like.
> What is is the backend MTA? Postfix? SendMail?
It's postfix, but it really shouldn't matter what our MTA is if we're
looking
Spam detection usually comes in via SMTP, not IMAP ;)
What is is the backend MTA? Postfix? SendMail?
Are you looking to offer this for free, or as a value add?
You can also reach me offlist for suggestions..
On 17-07-18 08:50 AM, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
Thanks to all who replied thus far, to ans
Thanks to all who replied thus far, to answer a few questions:
* our IMAP implementation is dovecot
* approx. 25K mail boxes but they will not all be using this, most won't
And a follow-up question:
* anybody familiar with zerospam.ca ?
Will summarize thread.
- mark
Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> H
How many mailboxes? If you're small, you can do just fine with a couple of
Barracuda boxes--we've had ours for a couple of years and the big dogs on the
list might laugh, they do okay. I'd recommend going up a size or two from what
you think you need; I've had some CPU issues on mine, firmware h
I’m afraid it is much like driving these days. Or maybe manufacturing cars.
Back in the day any old inventor could tinker in his backyard and come up with
something that had four wheels and an engine. And driving it didn’t really
need too much of a license.
These days, you get a much stricte
> Il 17 luglio 2017 alle 21.05 Tim Starr ha scritto:
>
> 2) Why allow email to be sent at all from "unmanaged servers"?
>
I've been buying an "unmanaged server" from various European providers
(including OVH, and currently Contabo) for the last 15 years, to run my
personal website and em
[Discussing Hetzner]
> Keep reminding us of that by reducing the volume of spam leaving your
> network and responding promptly to abuse notifications. :)
I sent them a spam report recently. I got a prompt auto-ack.
ab...@hetzner.de said:
> Our office hours concerning abuse enquiries are Mond
On 2017-07-17 15:44:09 (+0200), Hetzner Blacklist wrote:
I just got back from a 2 week holiday and have been reading this thread
with a lot of interest. I thought I would respond and try to explain the
situation from our perspective.
Thank you for engaging with this community. I'm sure this m
As far as #2, because users of said servers often want to send email.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017, at 12:05, Tim Starr wrote:
> An overall admirable response, keep up the good work. Just 2 questions:>
> 1) Why not put TLDR at top?
> 2) Why allow email to be sent at all from "unmanaged servers"?
>
> -T
16 matches
Mail list logo
