Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

One question I'd ask for submission servers, if your expected use case is mail clients, is whether they even support the concept of partial success. I don't think any support a real ux for it, but maybe some will keep a scoreboard of successful recipients and keep retrying the message with the

Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

On 09/11/2017 06:52 PM, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote: Indeed, I would like the sender to know right away. In my use case I intend to place this on a MSA, so I would expect to see few if any mail servers -- but in any event it's good to consider this case. I agree that MUAs will ideally show

Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

On 11 Sep 2017, at 17:38, Michael Peddemors wrote: Do you really want them to retry in this situation? This is a very good question. I think the answer depends on who will I be showing the error to. If I'm on my laptop happily sending emails out it really doesn't matter much I think, as

Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

Do you really want them to retry in this situation? Compromised users/rate limiter users, you probably aren't sure which but if you do not want them to send any more while they are rate limited, you probably should set a permanent error. Otherwise you might find a back load of messages in

[mailop] Best rate limiting response?

Over the years I've seen rate limiting responses as 421 and 451 (with the first being the most frequent). Is there a consensus in what the correct code should be? I'm going through RFC-5821 and none of the codes mentioned there seem to be a perfect match to "hitting a rate limit for an

[mailop] Contact at Naver

Hi All, I am looking for a contact at naver.com, attempts to contact via abuse and postmaster addresses have failed. Does anyone know a suitable person to contact? -- Marc Bradshaw - Deliverability/Abuse at FastMail m...@fastmailteam.com | @marcbradshaw[1] Links: 1.

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

We're aware of the issue and investigating. Thanks for the notice. Brandon On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Todd Herr wrote: > No apology necessary, Matt; I was more interested in sanity checking what > we were seeing. > > Thanks for the reply. > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

No apology necessary, Matt; I was more interested in sanity checking what we were seeing. Thanks for the reply. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Matt Gilbert < matthew.gilb...@mailchimp.com> wrote: > That’s correct Todd, this hasn’t impacted our actual delivery at all that > we can see. It

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

On 11 Sep 2017, at 9:16, Matt Gilbert wrote: This issue looks to be impacting 100% of our IPs as well. We’re seeing 100% bad reputation since 9/9 on all of our DKIM domains. Any updates about this will be appreciated. +1 All IPs with traffic in the last 24 hours for us. IPs that were

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

That’s correct Todd, this hasn’t impacted our actual delivery at all that we can see. It appears to be only in what postmaster tools is displaying, rather than the actual reputation. Sorry for not being clearer on that point in my initial response. Thanks, Matt Gilbert - Deliverability

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

When you say "impacting 100% of our IPs as well" are you really seeing an impact on delivery, or are you just seeing likely erroneous data displayed in Google's Postmaster Tools. We're seeing the same data as everyone else, but we haven't yet seen that there's been a real impact on delivery or

Re: [mailop] problem with gmail and pdf

Il 11/09/2017 17:48, Brandon Long via mailop ha scritto: I know we've had false positives in our PDF scanners before, if you can make an example available by url to me, I can file a bug for our av folks. Brandon On Sep 11, 2017 4:03 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll"

Re: [mailop] problem with gmail and pdf

I know we've had false positives in our PDF scanners before, if you can make an example available by url to me, I can file a bug for our av folks. Brandon On Sep 11, 2017 4:03 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll" wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 12:27 +0200, Roberto Tagliaferri -

[mailop] problem with gmail and pdf

Hi, i've some script that send email with a pdf (created with html2pdf libray). Some days ago all the emails ware rejected with this error: Reporting-MTA: dns; dns.tosnet.it X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 14A592E01BE X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822;i...@ristrutturami.eu Arrival-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 17:46:43

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that date at all. -- Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com ewald.kess...@webpower.nl t: +31 342 423 262 On 11 September 2017 at 10:24,

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

Hi Vaibhav, I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red). A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet. All of them have always been green before. I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their "ideas" about what is green or red). Stefano --

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

We can confirm that we see the same on other accounts. Everything is red on the 9th. Maarten Oelering Postmastery > On 11 Sep 2017, at 09:39, Vaibhav wrote: > > Hey, > > I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th > Sept report. Does

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

Or you have a new customer, or a new list, that has issues.  Considered that possibility? From: mailop on behalf of Vaibhav Date: Monday, 11 September 2017 at 1:22 PM To: Subject: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP

[mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

Hey, I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ? Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end. --Vaibhav ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org