Re: [mailop] Gmail & SPF=none & Adobe campaign

In article <20210117024748.af0ea6af6...@ary.qy> you write: >In article > you write: >>There appear to be a fair amount of oddities in that TXT record. I notice >>that there are a lot of extra quote marks in there, which might confuse >>things. An example: >>ip" "4:66.235.130.0/24 >> >>Which seem

Re: [mailop] Gmail & SPF=none & Adobe campaign

In article you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >There appear to be a fair amount of oddities in that TXT record. I notice >that there are a lot of extra quote marks in there, which might confuse >things. An example: >ip" "4:66.235.130.0/24 > >Which seems improperly formed and is likely to me

Re: [mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

On 2021-01-16 at 19:05 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: > Dnia 16.01.2021 o godz. 11:48:56 Tom Sommer via mailop pisze: > > The user IS informed that "The message has been reported > > as Junk" as they click the button. > > If they have no idea what "Junk" means, they won't understand this >

[mailop] Blocked sending from Spectrum

Hello, We are a municipal ISP in Northeast Ohio and several of our customers still have their legacy email accounts with Spectrum from before they switched over to our service. Spectrum is blocking their email from sending from their home Internet connection. Does anyone know a contact person a

Re: [mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

I asked Simply.com to consider changing this to an opt-in FBL-style feed instead of them shot-gunning reports like this. They declined. I am not entirely sure they know what an ISP feedback loop is, so I tried to explain it to them, but nothing came of it. In my opinion, if it's mail that is autom

Re: [mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

Dnia 16.01.2021 o godz. 11:48:56 Tom Sommer via mailop pisze: > > The user IS informed that "The message has been reported > as Junk" as they click the button. If they have no idea what "Junk" means, they won't understand this message as well. It should be a much more extensive explanation, and

Re: [mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

Hi Tom, On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Tom Sommer via mailop wrote: > I don't disagree with the fact that the "Junk" button is made of evil, which > is also why we do not permanently ban or block anything based on it (like > some other e-mail providers do). Back in November 2020 Simply

Re: [mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

On 2021-01-15 11:21, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote: we received few automated abuse reports from Simply.com. I checked the logs and sounds like they automatically did a GET request to the List-Unsubscribe url and the a POST request to the List-Unsubscribe url via the "List-Unsubscribe-Po

Re: [mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

On 1/15/21 11:21 AM, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote: Of course their server their rules, but I'd like to know if other abuse desks started receiving this kind of automated simply.com reports and what's your opinion about this practice. Hundreds... maybe about a thousand

Re: [mailop] Gmail & SPF=none & Adobe campaign

There appear to be a fair amount of oddities in that TXT record. I notice that there are a lot of extra quote marks in there, which might confuse things. An example: ip" "4:66.235.130.0/24 Which seems improperly formed and is likely to mess up some parsers. There are other format/editing issues

[mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

Hi all, we received few automated abuse reports from Simply.com. The abuse report is an email from "Simply.com abuse team < abuse-rep...@robot.simply.com>" with subject "Abuse report for #IPredacted# (#Providername# / #ASNUMBER#)" > Hi > > This is a complaint regarding spam received from #IPreda