On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:51 AM Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
> we don't care of DNS SPF RRs for authentication.
>
Are you referring in this statement to the deprecated (type 99) SPF
resource records? And/or are you talking about SPF records in TXT RRs (type
16)?
On 2021-04-07 11:09, John Levine via mailop wrote:
It appears that Laura Atkins via mailop said:
Forcing alignment across all 3 entities (5321.from, 5322.from and the
d=) breaks a lot of current implementations. Many ESPs and a ton of
small businesses
are going to be scrambling to get this
It appears that Laura Atkins via mailop said:
>Forcing alignment across all 3 entities (5321.from, 5322.from and the d=)
>breaks a lot of current implementations. Many ESPs and a ton of small
>businesses
>are going to be scrambling to get this implemented.
It's also specifically contrary to
Am 07.04.21 um 10:51 schrieb Laura Atkins via mailop:
Forcing alignment across all 3 entities (5321.from, 5322.from and the
d=) breaks a lot of current implementations. Many ESPs and a ton of
small businesses are going to be scrambling to get this implemented. In
many cases they have the
Hi Florian,
some more question on alignment:
Hopefully "alignment" between 5322.from and 5321.from talks about the
domain only:
As used by myself (and others):
5321.from: prvs=07316f9e9c=h...@schlittermann.de
5322.from: h...@schlittermann.de
@Florian: How will T-Online handle
> On 7 Apr 2021, at 08:42, Tim Düsterhus via mailop wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> [my first list post, please notify me if I break some etiquette]
>
> On 4/6/21 3:48 PM, Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop wrote:
>>> t-online.de is looking for full alignment between the SPF domain
>>> (5321.from) AND the
Hello,
[my first list post, please notify me if I break some etiquette]
On 4/6/21 3:48 PM, Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop wrote:
t-online.de is looking for full alignment between the SPF domain (5321.from)
AND the d=domain (DKIM) with the header from (5322.from).
ACK
t-online.de is
