On 10/12/21 2:02 AM, Sidsel Jensen via mailop wrote:
*My question to you: What are your thoughts on starting to sign with
ed25519 keys and what is currently holdning you back?*
As soon as Mail::DKIM supports it I'll probably do it (dual sign).
___
opendmarc was very recently updated due to a security issue IIRC, I
think was end of May start of June, v 1.4.1. Might have been on
spamassassin list.
I had a discussion with that person who's told me opendkim (which wont
build on current supported openssl's without a patch), is being worked
It appears that Jarland Donnell via mailop said:
>I have none, and ordinarily I would take that as a reason to not
>respond. However, I was highly motivated by the first Google result,
>which was a paid advertisement, which immediately stated "Sendx.io - No
>More Monkey Business - We Will
Since you use SpamAssassin, you are welcome to use my rule set:
https://config.mxroute.com/spam/local.cf
It's automatically updated every day based on my rspamd rules:
https://github.com/mxroute/rspamd_rules
On 2021-10-14 16:20, Mohit Godiya via mailop wrote:
Hey All,
I am sure this topic
I have none, and ordinarily I would take that as a reason to not
respond. However, I was highly motivated by the first Google result,
which was a paid advertisement, which immediately stated "Sendx.io - No
More Monkey Business - We Will Never Ban You."
I can't bring myself to read "we will
Am 14.10.21 um 23:20 schrieb Mohit Godiya via mailop:
> Hey All,
>
> I am sure this topic has come up in the past.
> I am wondering if anyone with more experience than me can comment on what
> they do to fight spam.
I'm using two pretty different systems on different mail servers which have
Hey All,
I am sure this topic has come up in the past.
I am wondering if anyone with more experience than me can comment on
what they do to fight spam.
I have a pretty basic and effective setup that I feel might become a
little unmanageable in the future.
I am using greylisting, SA, DCC,
We have someone asking us for info on SendX, their reputation, etc., and
honestly we have never heard of them; while ordinarily we would consider that
in and of itself as a data point, I'm wondering if anybody has any experience
with them?
Anne
---
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
CEO ISIPP SuretyMail
I've tried to get in touch with the OpenDKIM developers with little success, it
appears that the project was alive 10 years ago with lots of development
effort, which eventually died along with all their other projects (OpenDMARC,
OpenARC, etc)
Some poor dev seems to make a few adjustments
On Tue, October 12, 2021 11:02, Sidsel Jensen via mailop wrote:
> My question to you: What are your thoughts on starting to sign with
ed25519 keys and what is currently holdning you back?
> Is this something that we could push for in 2022 together?
While this question is likely to be aimed mostly
Fair. To be frank, when I appear to blame all of my challenges on Google
it isn't actually blame in the traditional sense. Today is a good day,
things are more balanced than some days. That means today 40% of all
outbound mail from customers is going to Gmail. Next in line, 4% to
Hotmail. Of
On 2021-10-12 at 15:59:20 UTC-0400 (Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:59:20 +0200)
Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Well, I would say that any need to communicate with Google users from
outside
Google will infuriate the random user.
s/Google/the Freemail Giant Cartel/g
It's not
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 11:45, Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop
wrote:
> the requirements posted before only apply to ESPs (email service providers |
> mass mailers | ... mailhosters).
> Mailing lists should not be concerned as far as I can tell from our stats.
> []
> that's the reason we didn't
Otto! Long time no talk. Hope you're doing well. :)
If it's any consolation, Gmail thinks that your post to Mailop is a
phish, so perhaps the bad domain made it to the Google Safe Browsing
blacklist, at least. :)
Cheers,
Al Iverson
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:12 AM Otto J. Makela via mailop
We received some phising emails, and when you access the phishing
site redirector
hxxps://googleweblight.com/i?u=sso-webmailsrvr-s334bggbh.pages.dev?user=em...@example.com
you will be redirected to a website using such a long URL (about 15k)
that when you try to report it to Firefox Phishing
ADMIN NOTE
On 14 Oct 2021, at 10:39, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
[ yet more content about a specific problem unrelated to the thread subject ]
All: please desist from turning every single thread on this list into
discussion of Jaroslaw’s Google issue.
I have had more than one email sent
Dnia 14.10.2021 o godz. 11:00:50 Lena--- via mailop pisze:
>
> But possibly content of your emails causes Gmail users to click "Spam"
> more often than caused by average user stupidity.
> Or you pissed off one Gmail user, and now he clicks "Spam" on every your
> email.
I know these people. I
> From: Jaroslaw Rafa
> "low reputation of the sending domain"
I'm afraid that it'll be the same for any free domain name
(because of abuse by spammers). Unfair, yes.
But possibly content of your emails causes Gmail users to click "Spam"
more often than caused by average user stupidity.
Or you
We do not get any data since 4 October
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:32 AM Maarten Oelering via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> We are monitoring hundreds of domains in GPT. Some of these domains never
> showed any data.
> But since October 8 all domains are returning 404 errors on the GPT
We are monitoring hundreds of domains in GPT. Some of these domains never
showed any data.
But since October 8 all domains are returning 404 errors on the GPT API. So
something is wrong at Google.
Maarten
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
> Anyone here from Google who can unplug GPT and plug it back in?
> It seems to have stopped working on October 4th.
We have similar, VERY nasty problems in August/September.
Google downgraded our @imp.ch domain reputation form 'high' to 'bad'
from one day to the other effectively shutting down
21 matches
Mail list logo
