On 3/26/23 2:32 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
One big downside: you need to have two MXes.
I don't view multiple MX records as a bad thing.
Or are you referring to IPs that two different names resolve to? --
There are multiple ways around this.
I don't understand ~> appreciate the
Dnia 26.03.2023 o godz. 01:27:21 hg user via mailop pisze:
>
> Only RBL (ip, url or hash), bayes from past phishing or some handmade rules
> can detect them, and their score may not sum up to the spam threshold (I
> have to review and rescore these handmade rules).
Nobody really doing any
Dnia 24.03.2023 o godz. 17:33:32 Grant Taylor via mailop pisze:
> NoListing works by causing the sending server to cascade through
> multiple MXs.
>
> First MX either doesn't respond /or/ sends a TCP reset. Thereby
> causing the sending MTA to try the next MX.
>
> The next MX responds like
On 24/03/2023 23:37, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) via mailop wrote:
If you are going to block my MTA from sending email to your customers,
do us all the favour of preventing your users from sending email
to my MTAs in the first place.
When they send me mail, but you refuse to let me reply,
> On 25.03.2023 at 22:26 Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
>
> hg user via mailop (Sa 25 Mär 2023 18:39:06 CET):
>> A. extortion messages like "I recorded you doing bad things, pay me". Tons
>> deleted, but some in the inboxes.
>>
>> B. phishing, some generic, some specific for our web mail
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Dňa 25. marca 2023 17:11:48 UTC používateľ Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
napísal:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
I never understood different envelope senders for each attempt of a given
message. -- I can see different
