Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry invalidate the whole SPF entry?

2023-06-09 Thread Gellner, Oliver via mailop
> On 09.06.2023 at 09:36 Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: > > RFC 6652 provides for setting ra= and rr= tags, which are themselves flagged > as errors by most SPF checking sites... Does someone use those SPF tags or has any practical experience with them and ever received some reports? Or

Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry invalidate the whole SPF entry?

2023-06-09 Thread Slavko via mailop
Dňa 9. júna 2023 16:07:28 UTC používateľ Andrew C Aitchison via mailop napísal: >I asked one of the checker websites about that and recieved the reply: > RFC6652 is a proposed standard from 2012, but was replaced by DMARC in 2015. > DMARC reports on both SPF and DKIM. But that is their point

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Cox on the list that can help me out?

2023-06-09 Thread Scott Undercofler via mailop
Replied off list. > On Jun 9, 2023, at 8:21 AM, Michael E. Weisel via mailop > wrote: > > Hi fellow Mailopers, I hope everyone had a great week. I was wondering if > there was anyone on the list from the Cox Postmaster team that may be able to > contact me off list? I’m trying to help one

Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry invalidate the whole SPF entry?

2023-06-09 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: On Fri 09/Jun/2023 07:37:06 +0200 Benoît Panizzon via mailop wrote: If you don't care enough to publish a valid SPF record, why should we think you care whether we deliver your mail? The customer in question used an ESP to send

[mailop] Anyone from Cox on the list that can help me out?

2023-06-09 Thread Michael E. Weisel via mailop
Hi fellow Mailopers, I hope everyone had a great week. I was wondering if there was anyone on the list from the Cox Postmaster team that may be able to contact me off list? I’m trying to help one of our clients who had a sudden block on Monday/Tuesday, but I haven’t gotten a response back

Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry, invalidate the whole SPF entry?

2023-06-09 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 9.06.2023 o godz. 12:29:46 Joel M Snyder via mailop pisze: > If you want to spend an amusing few moments, try querying large > organization's DNS records for TXT and count the number of "we had > to put this in to verify a cert/web site/service" records that were > added for one-time domain

Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry, invalidate the whole SPF entry?

2023-06-09 Thread Joel M Snyder via mailop
Alessandro Vesely possibly may have written: >>> If you don't care enough to publish a valid SPF record, why should >>> we think you care whether we deliver your mail? >> >> The customer in question used an ESP to send marketing emails. >> That ESP told him what host to include in his SPF

Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry invalidate the whole SPF entry?

2023-06-09 Thread John R Levine via mailop
If you don't care enough to publish a valid SPF record, why should we think you care whether we deliver your mail? The customer in question used an ESP to send marketing emails. That ESP told him what host to include in his SPF record. Probably some years later, that ESP changed domain and

Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry invalidate the whole SPF entry?

2023-06-09 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Fri 09/Jun/2023 07:37:06 +0200 Benoît Panizzon via mailop wrote: If you don't care enough to publish a valid SPF record, why should we think you care whether we deliver your mail? The customer in question used an ESP to send marketing emails. That ESP told him what host to include in his