On 2023-11-18 18:59:53 (+0800), Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC
because we don't want to frustrate our users ability to use
third-party mailing lists that don't
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 23:33:13 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> Dnia 17.11.2023 o godz. 14:34:19 Lukas Tribus via mailop pisze:
> >
> > Google probably wants you to enable STARTTLS, so reducing sending
> > limits for non STARTTLS senders can make sense from Google's POV.
>
> That
It appears that Jarland Donnell via mailop said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Good news! They’ve been responding to abuse complaints. Favorably, I might add.
I've been sending ARF spam reports to them for years about every spam
they send me and the spam just keeps coming.
While I can somewhat believe that
Am 18.11.2023 um 10:46:52 Uhr schrieb John R Levine via mailop:
> We have a fake estate scam, a fake Celsius crypto scam, and a fake
> Bittrex crypto scam, along with the usual deluge of ads that my users
> don't really want.
>
> I'm trying to remember why I accept any mail from them at all.
If anybody has *any* contact, no matter how tenuous, at Centurylink, can you
please connect with me (ideally offlist so as to not clutter up the list).
It's quite urgent.
Thank you!
Anne
---
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Email Law & Policy Attorney
CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
It appears that Frank Bulk via mailop said:
>We've been having delivery issues to gmail since November 15 at 12:17 pm
>(Central). But there's still lots of email going through, too.
>
>Here's an example from our mail server's logs:
>
>Failed rr=Site gmail.com (2607:f8b0:4001:c5a::1a) said
Dňa 17. novembra 2023 22:42:58 UTC používateľ Michael Orlitzky via mailop
napísal:
>> > Google probably wants you to enable STARTTLS, so reducing sending
>> > limits for non STARTTLS senders can make sense from Google's POV.
>>
>> That thread makes me wonder, how come anybody is sending mail
On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC because we
don't want to frustrate our users ability to use third-party mailing lists that
don't mitigate it).
If you publish p=none you're enabling DMARC without
Hi,
Failed rr=Site gmail.com (2607:f8b0:4001:c5a::1a) said after data sent: 550
5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=NotAuthorizedError
75-20020a6b144e00b007a2a17ef77bsi3551757iou.146 - gsmtp 550-5.7.1
[2607:fe28:0:4000::10] The IP you're using to send mail is not\n550-5.7.1
