On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 19:02:04 + (GMT), Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
wrote:
>That is a surprise to hear. Reading this list has given me the impression
>that the spam volume is worse now than it was then. Spamming is a much bigger
>business now and the internet is faster, so I would have though
On 2023-11-19 at 14:02:04 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 19:02:04 +
(GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
is rumored to have said:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
On 2023-11-19 at 06:59:37 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:59:37 +0100)
Alessandro Vesely via mailop
is rumored to
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
On 2023-11-19 at 06:59:37 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:59:37 +0100)
Alessandro Vesely via mailop
is rumored to have said:
I don't think someone can drop almost all mail and still call itself a mail
server.
Were you running a mail system in t
On 2023-11-19 at 06:59:37 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:59:37 +0100)
Alessandro Vesely via mailop
is rumored to have said:
I don't think someone can drop almost all mail and still call itself a
mail server.
Were you running a mail system in the early-mid 2000s?
At that time, I tracked the pe
On Sun 19/Nov/2023 00:15:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On 2023-11-18 18:59:53 (+0800), Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC because we
don't want to frustra