Google Gmail accept such email: (source from soyeo...@gmail.com)
https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/d73303d3f304a275bb6f129c0d4934ce30680629/DKIM/gmail-forwarding-header-20240126.txt
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024, Scott Mutter wrote:
The 173.225.104.91 server has sent 68 emails to gmail.com email addresses
thus far in January 2024.
GPT will not present data for that volume. From their FAQ: "Most of the
Postmaster Tools dashboards will only display data when there’s a
sizable
On 1/26/24 16:06, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
Independent of this I wouldn’t use r...@hostname.example.org
as a sender address to external recipients. This doesn’t look
professional,
I'll agree that sending from root@ is not best practice. But
I don't know if it's unprofessional per
I've had domains listed in Google Postmaster Tools since 2016. Never
gotten one lick of any information from any of those except for "No data to
display at this time. Please come back later. Postmaster Tools requires
that your domain satisfies certain conditions before data is visible for
this
> Independent of this I wouldn’t use r...@hostname.example.org as a sender
> address to external recipients. This doesn’t look professional, makes
> replying to those emails impossible and in case hostname.example.org doesn’t
> have a public IP address it might also increase the risk that those
> On 25.01.2024 at 16:29 Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
>
> At work we are currently deploying DKIM.
>
> Do people here have experience with messages from sub.example.org
> signed with d=example.org?
> That way is much easier to handle for us because we have a lot of
> domains (machines sending
> On 26.01.2024 at 19:36 Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
>
> It seems messages being sent from 173.225.104.91 are being delivered into
> Gmail user's spam boxes.
Is each and every message from different organizational domains sent by this
server placed into the spam folder? Or does it affect
> The Google Postmaster tool is a joke for me. Apparently you have to have
10's of millions of messages coming from the server for Google Postmaster
to report anything.
You don’t have to have that much volume for data… this behavior is typical
of GMT if your domain rep is very low (IE bad/dark
It appears that Scott Mutter via mailop said:
>But as it stands now, it's only when our users notify us that their
>messages are being sent to their Gmail spambox do I realize there's an
>issue. There's no rejection or anything from Google's acceptance of the
>message to indicate that there is
>> I'm not seeing where 173.225.104.91 is on any public blacklist.
> That is also not relevant. Your reputation and what receivers think about
your email is relevant.
Maybe not, but please pray tell how else I'm suppose to know the reputation
of my server's IP address? Does Google have a public
Hello!
Does anybody of ebay reads here?
At work we receive mails from ebay (SPF valid) to an address that isn't
assigned to an account and can't be registered by the ebay user because
he can't access the inbox, it is root@our.domain.
I already called their customer service and they said the
How to contact Google to beg for Gmail spam folder forgiveness:
https://www.spamresource.com/2022/01/gmails-sender-contact-form-what-and-why.html
Cheers,
Al Iverson
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:34 PM Scott Mutter via mailop
wrote:
>
> It seems messages being sent from 173.225.104.91 are being
> According to Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
> :
> > I'm just chiming in here with some support for you because I know a
> >few people who use OVH as well.
> >
> > Blocking on a case-by-case basis is the better approach so that
> >legitimate (non-spamming) hosts aren't
It appears that Scott Mutter via mailop said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>It seems messages being sent from 173.225.104.91 are being delivered into
>Gmail user's spam boxes.
>
>These messages are DKIM signed, pass SPF and DMARC.
>
>I'm not seeing where 173.225.104.91 is on any public blacklist.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 10:35 AM Scott Mutter via mailop
wrote:
> It seems messages being sent from 173.225.104.91 are being delivered into
> Gmail user's spam boxes.
> These messages are DKIM signed, pass SPF and DMARC.
>
Properly meeting basic email authentication standards does not mean
It seems messages being sent from 173.225.104.91 are being delivered into
Gmail user's spam boxes.
These messages are DKIM signed, pass SPF and DMARC.
I'm not seeing where 173.225.104.91 is on any public blacklist.
Anyone from Google able to shed any light on this?
Thanks
On 26 Jan 2024, at 10:28, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> But even people who have extensive theoretical knowledge often fail to
> actually apply it when it comes to practice.
This has absolutely nothing at all to do with email or interoperating email
systems. Please desist.
More generally,
Hellow Jörg,
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 10:49 +0100, Jörg Backschues via mailop wrote:
> Am 25.01.24 um 23:58 schrieb Anne Mitchell via mailop:
>
> > > On Jan 25, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Byron Lunz via mailop
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Or, you can use https://aboutmy.email/ - not affiliated, just a
> > >
Hellow Alex,
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:55 +, Brotman, Alex via mailop wrote:
> I did start getting reports again, I haven't looked to see if they're
> consistently appearing
>
Me too. Also i received again that reports from Google, today!
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
Dňa 26. 1. o 10:49 Jörg Backschues via mailop napísal(a):
Sorry, but there are issues with AboutMy.email when using multiple DKIM
signatures e.g. RSA & Ed25519.
I was curious, and no, there are not issues with dual signed DKIM, both
my signatures are in pass state, the only missing thing is,
Dnia 25.01.2024 o godz. 22:00:08 John Levine via mailop pisze:
>
> As I may have said once or twice before, when you pick the cheapest,
> crummiest option, often you get what you pay for.
s/the cheapest, crummiest option/the option you CAN actually afford/
Certainly you, John, are not the
Am 25.01.24 um 23:58 schrieb Anne Mitchell via mailop:
On Jan 25, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Byron Lunz via mailop wrote:
Or, you can use https://aboutmy.email/ - not affiliated, just a pleased user.
Yes, absolutely, aboutmy.email rocks! And, is offered by a very trusted source!
Sorry, but there
Am 26.01.24 um 09:42 schrieb Simon Bressier via mailop:
Hi all,
FYI Hans-Martin, I reached out to ovh team yesterday night to push
your message, seems your abuse report has been processed by the proper
team. No idea if they answered you, but at least, they have handled
the report, and
Hi all,
FYI Hans-Martin, I reached out to ovh team yesterday night to push your
message, seems your abuse report has been processed by the proper team. No
idea if they answered you, but at least, they have handled the report, and
probably done the appropriate actions.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at
24 matches
Mail list logo
