Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools data missing recently - anyone else?

We noticed it as well. On the GPT website there’s data for 2nd. But the API does not return any data for the last couple of days. Maarten > On 4 Dec 2023, at 22:52, Omar Thameen via mailop wrote: > > Is anyone else seeing data missing from Google Postmaster Tools? > For all our hosted

Re: [mailop] New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF)

I would like to believe that the solution offered by Abusix is a drop-in replacement. Adding the CFBL-Address header is not too difficult for most senders. But most sender systems rely on ARF reports, with the rfc822 attachment. Not XARF, with the json attachment. So there’s two standards to

Re: [mailop] verifier.port25.com

You can try our free tool at emailaudit.com. It is especially strong in authentication checks. Maarten > On 23 May 2023, at 20:31, Blake Hudson via mailop wrote: > > Looks like the email verification application at verifier.port25.com > described in this >

Re: [mailop] Email System Testing Methodologies?

We developed emailaudit.com for this purpose. It checks compliancy, authentication, and technical best practices. It’s free with a limit of 3 audits per day. Maarten Oelering Postmastery > On 10 Jun 2022, at 16:48, Jesse Hathaway via mailop wrote: > > I am working on

Re: [mailop] Best mailbox provider for personal domain?

If you have a dozen of personal mailboxes at G Suite Legacy then even a few $ per mailbox adds up. A free solution is Cloudflare Email Routing, now in public beta. If you use them as DNS provider for your domain (also free option) then you can setup email forwards. For example to gmail.com or

Re: [mailop] Best mailbox provider for personal domain?

What about iCloud+ with 50GB for $1/€1. I see it supports up to 5 custom domains. Maarten > On 9 Apr 2022, at 08:40, Byung-Hee HWANG via mailop wrote: > > Tara Natanson via mailop writes: > >> (...thanks...) >> (assuming I have no desire to run my own server) >> >> Thanks in advance for

Re: [mailop] Best mailbox provider for personal domain?

Hi Tara, I have the same issue. I am using 3 legacy G Suite domains for different purposes. One option I am considering is IONOS, because I know the anti-spam should be good after someone we both know well is responsible for that. Maarten > On 8 Apr 2022, at 16:55, Tara Natanson via mailop

Re: [mailop] Who Do You Recommend for Small Business Regular (Non-Bulk) Email?

> On 2 Mar 2022, at 18:52, Matthew V via mailop wrote: > > This is likely tied to Google's announcement that they are ending the legacy > (Free) Gsuite services so many small or hobby domain owners are looking at > other options. That is exactly the reason why I am looking for a solution (in

Re: [mailop] Sending to google/gmail - timeouts mainly with larger (~400k+) emails

Hi Andrew, Sorry for misreading the 400k, my bad. Thank you for sharing more details and the solution. Maarten > On 2 Dec 2021, at 22:52, Andrew Hearn via mailop wrote: > > After trying a few things, disabling TCP Fast Open seems to have worked... > > My mail queue is being delivered

Re: [mailop] Sending to google/gmail - timeouts mainly with larger (~400k+) emails

Hi, Sending 400K mailings with Exim, hats off! With large mailings you will always see some messages failing due to various reasons. Even with more powerful MTAs. I would expect that the 1000 mails are left in the queue due to the to 454 … over quota replies from Gmail. Are they all

Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools - No data since October 4th

We are monitoring hundreds of domains in GPT. Some of these domains never showed any data. But since October 8 all domains are returning 404 errors on the GPT API. So something is wrong at Google. Maarten ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] DKIM validation behaviour when multiple _domainkey TXT records are present

Our free tester at emailaudit.com checks SPF, DKIM, alignment, and DMARC. Maarten Postmastery > On 2 Jun 2021, at 14:14, Simon Arlott via mailop wrote: > > I've yet to find a comprehensive DMARC tester that will handle all of the > nuances like RFC5322.From and

Re: [mailop] Reliability of DMARC reports?

The reports can be very helpful. But they are not that intuitive. Make sure you understand the the following. The results of SPF and DKIM sec (without considering alignment) are given in /. The results of SPF and DKIM in DMARC context (with alignment considered) are in /. SPF breaks with

Re: [mailop] JSON mail server logs ?

We have built integrations with many MTA’s and SMTP services. I would rather see all information available in the logs of the Exim, than a common scheme provided by all MTAs. It would also be helpful is the logs report on “transaction” level (deferral, bounce, delivery) and not on process level

Re: [mailop] Anyone contact to DigiByte Media B.V. Utrecht (maybe linked to megafon.ru) or knows how to get them disconnected by Google?

Hi Benoit, I suggest to report the spam mails to the Dutch authorities here: https://www.acm.nl/nl/onderwerpen/telecommunicatie/meld-spam-bij-de-acm Regards, Maarten > On 12 Nov 2020, at 14:26, Benoît Panizzon via mailop > wrote: > > Hi Gang > > We see a constant stream of spam mails

[mailop] Issues at Orange

Mailbox provider Orange in France currently has issues with their infrastructure. They reject incoming mail with: 421 # ID # ME Service refused. Please try again later. Service refused, please try later. OFR_108; [108] We were told that they are asking the senders to pause mailing to their

Re: [mailop] Reg. Bounces at Yahoo / AOL

Hi Vaibhav, We saw this reply appear 1-2 months ago. I think you should treat it as invalid address, so hard bounce. Maarten > On 11 May 2020, at 04:34, Vaibhav via mailop wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Recently we observed below error while delivering emails to Yahoo / AOL > recipients. >

Re: [mailop] Gmail Postmaster Tools Issue?

Hi John, Yes we see the same issue across many senders. Maarten Oelering Postmastery > On 12 Dec 2019, at 17:12, John Rowan via mailop wrote: > > Hi all, > > When I checked our domains/subdomains today, I noticed that beginning today > *all* of our IP reputations were bad. Previously they

Re: [mailop] Reasons to add plain text alternative to email?

I want to thank all contributors to this discussion for their feedback. What I learned from this: - There are still people that prefer plain text. - Text alternative may be used by accessibility tools. - Text alternative should be complete and readable. - For bulk mail html only should work just

[mailop] Reasons to add plain text alternative to email?

Multipart messages with html and text alternatives are generally considered best practice. Senders with html templates should add a text version is the common believe. But it's almost 2020, and we were wondering if there's still a good reason for adding plain text to a html message. Is there a

Re: [mailop] Suggestions for VPS providers in Europe?

I have good experience using TransIP VPS. Port 25 block can be cleared with a button and reverse DNS is easy to setup. But I would not use any VPS for larger volumes or ESP services. Maarten > On 3 Dec 2019, at 00:59, John Levine via mailop wrote: > > I warned a guy away from Hetzner and OVH

[mailop] Microsoft delivery failures - 5.4.4 (unable to route: no mail hosts for domain)

Hi all, On the 5th of October we noticed a spike in delivery failures at domains hotmail.com, outlook.com, msn.com, and live.com. The failures were caused by DNS lookup errors reported by the MTA as "5.4.4 (unable to route: no mail hosts for domain)”. This is problematic as the error is

Re: [mailop] Gmail Postmaster IP reputation shift on July 2nd

We see many unrelated senders going red on July 3 (CET). Definitely looks like something happened on the side of Google. Maarten Oelering Postmastery > On 5 Jul 2019, at 18:29, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote: > > I’m seeing jumps on a couple of my clients, but no change on others. > >