On 3/27/2022 12:17 AM, someone wrote:
> I would tell your brother exactly that. Yahoo is easily broken and
> nobody ever seems to be home.
> Best of luck Mike.
Yeah, while I see that might be a response from Yahoo, I am not
convinced it is a solution.
The question would be, in my mind, why would
I've been sending message to my brother for years.
Yet suddenly Yahoo decides that a message to my brother is not worthy of
being delivered ...
: host mta7.am0.yahoodns.net[67.195.228.106] said: 554
5.7.9
Message not accepted for policy reasons. See
On 3/4/2022 10:38 AM, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote:
> Think 'grandma', who has already registered grandmascookies.com with NameCheap
>[snip]
Or for me... think "grandpa" who already had a domain registered with
namecheap and switched it easily to gandi.net. :)
But to your point, I agree that
On 3/3/2022 12:45 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> He is using Google Domains as his registrar and has recently found out
> that he can forward up to 100 email addresses as part of that service.
>[snip]
gandi.net registrar has a similar service when you register a domain
with them: 2
On 2/2/2022 10:31 PM, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
> A lot of the issues stem from the way IT managers, and maybe technology
> managers in general bathe in arrogance. "There's no such thing as a
> good idea, unless it is *my* idea." It's easier to get blood out of a
> stone than for someone in
On 12/5/2019 7:26 PM, Large Hadron Collider via mailop wrote:
> [snip]
> > One of my requirements is that the MTA be capable of punting emails that
> are destined for a UUCP host (either as defined in a forwarding file, or
> explicitly named with a bangpath) into Unix-to-Unix copy.
> [snip]
