In article <01rv5k2v2lw2005...@mauve.mrochek.com> you write:
>Speaking as someone who has been using +subaddress forms extensively for >25
>years, the main problem is broken web forms that don't handle +'s well. Maybe
>now that Exchange online supports it there will be some impetus to fix them. Or
On 2021-02-04 12:56 p.m., Ned Freed via mailop wrote:
PITA, still not sure if its worth it.
It's wonderful when dealing with political campaigns. Use a different subaddress
for each, and you can tell who is buying/selling lists.
And if they don't support it, well, you didn't really to donate
> I try to use +addressing whenever I sign up for something new. I'd say at
> signup it works like 95% of the time. Plenty of forms still don't think
> the + is a valid thing to find in an email. I've had 3-4 retailers so far
> (LandsEnd was one of them I think) who originally let me setup an
On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:08:16 -0800 (PST), Ned Freed via mailop
wrote:
>Speaking as someone who has been using +subaddress forms extensively for >25
>years, the main problem is broken web forms that don't handle +'s well. Maybe
>now that Exchange online supports it there will be some impetus to
> It seems I missed the announcement, but ...
> Plus Addressing in Exchange Online | Microsoft
>
