I can't tell if people truly believe response codes and enhanced codes are
used uniformly and reliably out in the wild, or if they are just talking
about their own personal systems and the codes they throw. Setting any kind
of hard rule based on 5xx/4xxx or x.x.x is completely irresponsible if
you'
On 9/19/19 20:38, Lyndon Nerenberg via mailop wrote:
Others have hinted at this, but let me call it out explicitly:
Pay attention to the SMTP Enhanced Status Codes
A [45]XX can be graduated by the associated [45].X.X.
Add to the below list, if you get a 550 5.7.1 you need to stop mailing
> And if it bounces ...
> Emergency Stop Emailing Immediately!
Others have hinted at this, but let me call it out explicitly:
Pay attention to the SMTP Enhanced Status Codes
A [45]XX can be graduated by the associated [45].X.X.
E.g.:
552 5.2.3
552 5.3.4 You sent something too porky f
>
> --
>
> *Michael J Wise*
> Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
>
> "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
>
> Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool
> <http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ?
>
>
>
> *From:* Luke
>
"Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
Got the Junk Mail Reporting
Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ?
From: Luke
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 12:48 PM
To: Michael Wise
Cc: Ken O'Driscoll via mailop
Subject: Re: [mailop] Best Re-enga
ttp://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ?
>
>
>
> *From:* mailop *On Behalf Of *Laura Atkins
> via mailop
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2019 9:38 AM
> *To:* Michael Peddemors
> *Cc:* mailop@mailop.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mailop] Best Re-engageme
Junk Mail Reporting
Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ?
From: mailop On Behalf Of Laura Atkins via mailop
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 9:38 AM
To: Michael Peddemors
Cc: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email
On 19 Se
> On 19 Sep 2019, at 16:47, Michael Peddemors via mailop
> wrote:
>
> On 2019-09-19 8:35 a.m., Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
>> Thus there are three categories of subscriber responses:
>> - Clicked on unsub link or "no" button. Stop mailing.
>> - Clicked on opt-in link or "yes" button. Continue
I agree with everything All said and regularly seeing "winback" campaigns
employed and work to varying degrees.
Depending on the type of sender, I find questionnaires work well in this
scenario as part of the chain of emails. Those emails for me have always
gotten high engagement and you get data
On 2019-09-19 8:35 a.m., Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Thus there are three categories of subscriber responses:
- Clicked on unsub link or "no" button. Stop mailing.
- Clicked on opt-in link or "yes" button. Continue mailing.
- Did nothing. Send one reminder mail asking them again to opt-in in
7-1
The answers to most of these issues would be found in A/B testing.
Test each element separately--queue up a list of variables, and test
each in turn. IME, the answers are different for each industry/list.
--Kelly
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:31 PM Damon via mailop wrote:
>
> I have asked around and
We save various examples internally and share them with some clients
upon request, but really, I can't share it externally. I can
summarize, though.
My suggestion is avoid most of the advice here from non-deliverability
consultants. This is one area where everybody has their own idea of
best pract
On 2019-09-19 2:41 a.m., Hal Murray via mailop wrote:
If you think I'm not engaging because your web-bugs aren't working, you could
ask me if I still want to be on your list.
This is the exact purpose of a re-engagement message - Hey we noticed
you've not reading/engaging with our emails in a
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:15:18AM -0400, Tom Kulzer via mailop wrote:
> > On Sep 18, 2019, at 10:24 PM, Jay Hennigan via mailop
> > wrote:
> >
> > "If you want to continue to receive email from us, click here or reply to
> > this email leaving the subject unchanged."
>
> Vacation autoresponde
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 10:24 PM, Jay Hennigan via mailop
> wrote:
>
> "If you want to continue to receive email from us, click here or reply to
> this email leaving the subject unchanged."
Vacation autoresponders will break that and auto confirm people on auto reply.
Cheers,
Tom Kulzer
CEO
Re-engagement is not a thing It's something marketers would like to
happen but it simply does not work well!
I saw plenty of panicked customers who did not understand GDPR try and
re-permission entire lists where they may not have had to and their lists
got decimated.
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at
Damon said:
> I have asked around and got a few opposing answers. Plain text vs. HTML,
> images ok/images not-ok, Opt-out Link at top or bottom, send from
> transactional IP vs. customer's 'regular' IP, CTA incentive for re-engaging
> included or not.
You skipped the most important part. Send ma
On 9/18/19 13:56, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote:
From experience, the best re-engagement email is sent to someone who has not
opened or clicked within the past four months, and says, essentially, "If you
want to continue to receive email from us, click here. Otherwise, you won't
ever hear f
If you're philosophically opposed to clicking links in an email, I doubt
you'd be in a position to receive too many re-engagement campaigns from
email marketers. Unless they are spammers then the whole point is moot.
I guess you could argue that one should subscribe to a newsletter but only
*read*
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote:
> opened or clicked within the past four months, and says, essentially, "If you
> want to continue to receive email from us, click here. Otherwise, you won't
I hate that stuff... beside the annoyance of requiring web stuff
to receive info v
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:22:32 -0700, Damon via mailop
wrote:
>I have asked around and got a few opposing answers. Plain text vs. HTML,
>images ok/images not-ok, Opt-out Link at top or bottom, send from
>transactional IP vs. customer's 'regular' IP, CTA incentive for re-engaging
>included or not.
>
I have asked around and got a few opposing answers. Plain text vs. HTML,
images ok/images not-ok, Opt-out Link at top or bottom, send from
transactional IP vs. customer's 'regular' IP, CTA incentive for re-engaging
included or not.
Anyone have any really good examples of ubiquitous re-engagement e
22 matches
Mail list logo
