I wouldn't want to see their breakfast! ;)
> Maybe they have just started eating their own dog food V2.0 at MS? ;->
>
> SCNR.
>
> Best,
>
> -C.
>
> > Am 15.12.2023 um 11:37 schrieb Laurent S. via mailop :
> >
> > It seems Microsoft made very recently a change. Since then, we get a
>
Hi,
What is stupid is that the header that causes the reject upon reinject
is written BY THEM! How about not writing such crazily long report on a
single header?
They have to protect their users from spam, but their users themselves
would never spam. So this makes sense.
SCNR
Bjoern
Maybe they have just started eating their own dog food V2.0 at MS? ;->
SCNR.
Best,
-C.
> Am 15.12.2023 um 11:37 schrieb Laurent S. via mailop :
>
> It seems Microsoft made very recently a change. Since then, we get a
> whole bunch of reject with this message:
>
>> 554 5.6.211 Invalid MIME
It seems Microsoft made very recently a change. Since then, we get a
whole bunch of reject with this message:
> 554 5.6.211 Invalid MIME Content: Single text value size (32820)
exceeded allowed maximum (32768) for the
'X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info-Original' header.
The company I work
