Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-20 Thread John Possidente via mailop
Thanks everyone. This has both clarified the question and answered it (them). Mike: Yes, 'host' is the term I should have used. Denny: That very well might be what the mailer was referring to. I'll read up on it before answering them John On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 8:46 AM Denny Watson via mail

Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-19 Thread Denny Watson via mailop
On 6/16/2023, John Possidente via mailop wrote: A sender of legally mandated bulk mail who are very conscious of making sure they're dotting every i and crossing every t (because they're required to) asked me today whether port 25 pingback is still necessary. I immediately thought, "Of course n

Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-16 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 2023-06-16 at 13:37:19 UTC-0400 (Fri, 16 Jun 2023 13:37:19 -0400) John Possidente via mailop is rumored to have said: > A sender of legally mandated bulk mail who are very conscious of making > sure they're dotting every i and crossing every t (because they're required > to) asked me today whe

Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-16 Thread Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
Am 16.06.23 um 20:02 schrieb Benny Pedersen via mailop: Mike Hillyer via mailop skrev den 2023-06-16 19:48: Sources or hosts? I don’t expect a given host to answer on port 25 just because it sends, but the domain in the return path should be accepting mail properly. If they can’t be bothered to

Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-16 Thread Benny Pedersen via mailop
Mike Hillyer via mailop skrev den 2023-06-16 19:48: Sources or hosts? I don’t expect a given host to answer on port 25 just because it sends, but the domain in the return path should be accepting mail properly. If they can’t be bothered to receive their DSNs then they are not likely a good-faith

Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-16 Thread Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
Am 16.06.23 um 19:37 schrieb John Possidente via mailop: A sender of legally mandated bulk mail who are very conscious of making sure they're dotting every i and crossing every t (because they're required to) asked me today whether port 25 pingback is still necessary. I immediately thought, "Of

Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-16 Thread Al Iverson via mailop
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:41 PM John Possidente via mailop wrote: > > A sender of legally mandated bulk mail who are very conscious of making sure > they're dotting every i and crossing every t (because they're required to) > asked me today whether port 25 pingback is still necessary. I immedia

Re: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-16 Thread Mike Hillyer via mailop
Possidente via mailop Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 1:37 PM To: mailop Subject: [mailop] Port 25 Pingback? A sender of legally mandated bulk mail who are very conscious of making sure they're dotting every i and crossing every t (because they're required to) asked me today whether port 25 p

[mailop] Port 25 Pingback?

2023-06-16 Thread John Possidente via mailop
A sender of legally mandated bulk mail who are very conscious of making sure they're dotting every i and crossing every t (because they're required to) asked me today whether port 25 pingback is still necessary. I immediately thought, "Of course not," but on second thought (before speaking, yay) re