On Thu 29/Jun/2023 04:46:35 +0200 Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
See RFC 8058 on doing one-click unsubs in a way unlikely to be mistriggered.
Its a good idea, but don't count on all MUAs implementing this function, so
best here is to have both, if request arrives from the RFC 8058
>>See RFC 8058 on doing one-click unsubs in a way unlikely to be mistriggered.
Its a good idea, but don't count on all MUAs implementing this function, so
best here is to have both, if request arrives from the RFC 8058 header, treat
it as secure enough to warrant one-click, but if it arrives
It appears that Grant Taylor via mailop said:
>On 6/28/23 11:07 AM, Chris Truitt via mailop wrote:
>> The Mimecast spam checking appears to be clicking every link. This has
>> inadvertently caused an uptick in Unsubscribes.
>
>Aside: Isn't this why the unsubscribe links are encouraged to use /
meddelande-
Från: Grant Taylor via mailop
Skickat: den 28 juni 2023 22:22
Till: mailop@mailop.org
Ämne: Re: [mailop] Mimecast Adimin Probation Block - 74.203.49.59
On 6/28/23 11:07 AM, Chris Truitt via mailop wrote:
> The Mimecast spam checking appears to be clicking every link. This
On 6/28/23 11:07 AM, Chris Truitt via mailop wrote:
The Mimecast spam checking appears to be clicking every link. This has
inadvertently caused an uptick in Unsubscribes.
Aside: Isn't this why the unsubscribe links are encouraged to use /
require a POST so that simple GETs don't accidentally
Replied offline.
From: mailop on behalf of Chris Truitt via mailop
Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 12:11 PM
To: Dave Smith via mailop
Subject: [mailop] Mimecast Adimin Probation Block - 74.203.49.59
Hi Dave,
We're getting a Mimecast Admin Probation Block.
The Mimecast spam checking appears
