On Wed 03/Oct/2018 21:38:24 +0200 Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:17 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> On Mon 01/Oct/2018 11:23:15 +0200 Benoit Panizzon wrote:
>>>
>>> * Keep cache history from which IP an SMTP Authentication occurred.
>>
>>
>> I'm curious about this
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:17 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Mon 01/Oct/2018 11:23:15 +0200 Benoit Panizzon wrote:
> >
> > * Keep cache history from which IP an SMTP Authentication occurred.
>
>
> I'm curious about this technique. Currently I block by IP and whitelist by
> domain, so I must be
rting Tool ?
-Original Message-
From: mailop On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 2:17 AM
To: mailop ; Benoit Panizzon
Cc: Brandon Long ; Michael Peddemors
Subject: Re: [mailop] How to find 'low flying' spamers? (Re: outlook.com
blocking reason: S3150 "network
On Mon 01/Oct/2018 11:23:15 +0200 Benoit Panizzon wrote:
>
> * Keep cache history from which IP an SMTP Authentication occurred.
I'm curious about this technique. Currently I block by IP and whitelist by
domain, so I must be missing something in between :-)
How long does that cache last?
At
In article <28c04515-a3e2-94bc-9ed2-6505ee089...@linuxmagic.com> you write:
>With all respect, if someone advertises an SPF -all we SHOULD be
>honouring this.. This was the senders wishes..
Like Brandon said, if it's a plain -all meaning no mail at all, sure.
Otherwise, sorry pal, you don't get
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:09 PM Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> On 18-10-01 04:48 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> > Mail servers that believe SPF policies and reject messages because of it
> > are really kidding themselves.
> >
>
> This could start a whole thread on it's own..
>
There have been
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:39 PM Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> On 18-10-01 03:52 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> > On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> >> We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
> >> sender when forwarding for this reason, but that
On 18-10-01 04:48 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
Mail servers that believe SPF policies and reject messages because of it
are really kidding themselves.
This could start a whole thread on it's own..
With all respect, if someone advertises an SPF -all we SHOULD be
honouring this.. This
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:02 PM Grant Taylor via mailop
wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> > We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
> > sender when forwarding for this reason, but that was mostly pointed
> > at tech folks running their
On 18-10-01 03:52 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
sender when forwarding for this reason, but that was mostly pointed at
tech folks running their own servers (this page
On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
sender when forwarding for this reason, but that was mostly pointed
at tech folks running their own servers (this page has a section for
procmail
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:35 AM Benoit Panizzon
wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Well thank you for all the hints. I also (thanks to Al) found out, that
> you need to set the browser language to english, to get to the propper
> help page where the delisting request form can be found. With german,
> you're
Sounds like you're doing MUCH correctly. Here is another suggestion:
Start limiting the ability of your end users to set up forwarders for
email accounts forwarding to freemail addresses. For starters, I
especially highly recommend not allowing anyone to auto-forward their
mail to ANY
, 2018 11:23
Cc: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] How to find 'low flying' spamers? (Re: outlook.com blocking
reason: S3150 "network is on our block list")
Hi List
Well thank you for all the hints. I also (thanks to Al) found out, that you
need to set the browser language to engli
14 matches
Mail list logo
