Yep, sources confirmed to me that the feed was repaired on March 15th.
Cheers,
Al
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 6:00 AM Bressier Simon wrote:
> Confirmed also on my side, it starts back on 15th for both Laposte &
> OpenSRS
>
> Le sam. 16 mars 2019 à 10:21, Benjamin BILLON a
> écrit :
>
>> After
I feel your pain. It's happened to all of us at some point or another.
I've searched my email archive and can't find anyone ever saying they
had a personal contact. It sounds like the best path to reporting a
false positive is to register on the Phishtank site and then report
the entry as a false
Confirmed also on my side, it starts back on 15th for both Laposte & OpenSRS
Le sam. 16 mars 2019 à 10:21, Benjamin BILLON a écrit :
> After thourough checking, we still received a (very) few complaints on
> March 12th to 14th (so non-null), and it's increasing since 15th. It
> might be back to
After thourough checking, we still received a (very) few complaints on March
12th to 14th (so non-null), and it's increasing since 15th. It might be back to
the usual count today.
--
Benjamin
From: Benjamin BILLON
Sent: vendredi 15 mars 2019 11:08
To: 'mailop'
Subject: RE: [mailop] Issue
I had already forwarded this to folks at Charter, and they said they'd been
able to contact Marc. Sorry, should have confirmed back here.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: mailop On Behalf Of Anne P. Mitchell,
> Esq.
>
On Fri 15/Mar/2019 23:46:13 +0100 Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:54 PM Jesse Thompson via mailop wrote:
>>
>> As it stands now, these "conditional" issues are cropping up as unforeseen
>> or "poorly planned by IT".
Conditional rewriting seems to give a signal that
Jaren,
Phishtank is part of OpenDNS which I believe is now part of Cisco (since
2015?)... might try asking your contacts there for the right introductions.
~
Matt
> On Mar 16, 2019, at 09:59, Al Iverson wrote:
>
> I feel your pain. It's happened to all of us at some point or another.
> I've
On 3/16/19 11:50 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The issue with ARC is that it means nothing to small servers which don't
track domain reputation. They can easily add ARC stuff on forwarding,
but won't be able to evaluate incoming chains which may be spoofed.
Hence, small servers will have to
Yes! What you're saying about From header rewriting being necessary even in an
ARC world, as well as what Jonathan says (in your link) about needing to
swallow the bitter pill in regards to rewriting, is what I'm trying to convey.
BOD 18-01 put the line in the sand that 100% adoption of
