Hello,
We've been seeing an issue with Yahoo blocking mail coming from one of
our domains 'bridgecatalog.com' since yesterday:
Remote Server returned: '421 4.7.0 [TSS04] Messages from 74.114.207.182
temporarily deferred due to unexpected volume or user complaints -
4.16.55.1;
Hmm, blocking connections is highly unusual for us, as it doesn't provide
any feedback, usually we respond with a 5xx banner or to HELO. I would
check to see if you can reach www.google.com on IPv6 from the same box, and
if you can, then go ahead and send me your IPv6 address and I can escalate
Hi,
+1 for Fastmail from me.
One of my family members uses Mail.de - so far, so good with them. Some
friends of mine use ProtonMail.
I'm not happy with the homogenisation of email service. We've got to keep
the bigger players honest :)
Kind regards,
Mike
Dňa 7. 9. o 20:20 John Levine via mailop napísal(a):
> It appears that John Capo via mailop said:
>> The only IPv6 issues I have seen, other than transit only via HE, is
>> delivering to Google. Google seems to assume that mail via IPv6 is spam.
>> The same mail flow via IPv4 is OK with
I think protonmail's business model is about being secure and private within
the bounds of Swiss law.
The case you mention, is about Interpol asking data about a user, which is
normal and legal.
On 7 Sep 2021 14:13:42 -0400 John Levine via mailop wrote:
> It appears that Mary via mailop
Hi,
If you'll look at Fail2ban, you can look to Crowdsec too (
https://crowdsec.net/)
To resume, Crowdsec is like a collaborative Fail2ban
Bye
Le mer. 8 sept. 2021 à 02:18, Jay Hennigan via mailop a
écrit :
> On 9/7/21 11:05, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote:
> > Fail2Ban to the rescue! ;-)
>
>
Agreed. I thought Yen's statements about it were excellent:
https://protonmail.com/blog/climate-activist-arrest/
On 9/8/2021 5:07 AM, Mary via mailop wrote:
I think protonmail's business model is about being secure and private within
the bounds of Swiss law.
The case you mention, is about
On 07/09/2021 20:05, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote:
> Fail2Ban to the rescue! ;-)
Yes we noticed this too - over the last two months, one new single-mailbox
server of ours experienced 38k SMTP connection attempts by attackers, 46k over
IMAP. The attacks were clearly coordinated among different
