> What get's spammers caught is that eventually they
>have to sell you something
Gee, did we drop through a wormhole into 1998 or something?
R's,
John
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
>> Back In The Day, there was a BCP for shutting down a DNSBL that included
>> running a daily check of the IP
>127.0.0.1 (which should never hit), IIRC, as well as 127.0.0.2 (which should
>always return a hit); and if my
>memory serves, if either criteria was different (both listed or neither
>... What get's spammers caught is that eventually they have to sell you
>something
That includes all of my legitimate customers... If you want I can get you some
legitimate subject lines :-).
A few points:
- There is a difference between 'real' companies that do stupid/illegal things
and
We saw some of this in our logs tonight:
Site yahoo.com (98.136.217.203) said in response to MAIL FROM (451 4.3.2
Internal error reading data)
Site yahoo.com (66.196.118.36) said in response to MAIL FROM (451 4.3.2
Internal error reading data)
Site yahoo.com (66.196.118.37) said in response to
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Marc Perkel wrote:
Here is a list of 3494938 words and phrases used in the subject line of
SPAM and never seen in the subject line of HAM
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/data/subject-spam.txt
Well besides all the other objections, I can see all sort of bugs in that
You're not the only one that saw it. From my perspective though it looks like
it's cleared up.
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 21:53, frnk...@iname.com wrote:
>
> We saw some of this in our logs tonight:
>
> Site yahoo.com (98.136.217.203) said in response to MAIL FROM (451 4.3.2
> Internal error
On 1/21/16 1:45 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Just to follow up on this. I'm in the process of improving the filter.
But I have filed my provisional patent so i'm going to give you an
overview of how it works.
As someone who has been involved in spam fighting stuff since 1999 or
so, hate to burst
On 1/22/16 9:24 AM, Neil Jenkins wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, at 11:01 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
I'm trying to find that checklist that the spam fighting regulars used
to post whenever someone is all excited about their end-game to spam
filtering... Anyone remember a URL for it?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 09:01 -0700, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> I'm trying to find that checklist that the spam fighting regulars used
> to post whenever someone is all excited about their end-game to spam
> filtering... Anyone remember a URL for it?
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, at 11:01 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> I'm trying to find that checklist that the spam fighting regulars used
> to post whenever someone is all excited about their end-game to spam
> filtering... Anyone remember a URL for it?
http://craphound.com/spamsolutions.txt I presume.
On 1/22/16 2:49 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Oh dear, oh dear...
Words fail me... not just because he sent me a cease and desist... but
that apparently I invented some MX hack when all I was doing was
suggesting he might be infringing on the SPF prior art as well as
pointing him to other docs
What get's spammers caught is that eventually they
have to sell you something
Gee, did we drop through a wormhole into 1998 or something?
He's missing a few somethings.
Spammers might not be trying to sell you something.
No kidding. The classic example is pump and dump, where they're
12 matches
Mail list logo
