It's unfortunate that dkim canonicalization is based on the raw message,
and now on what the message represents,
though defining a shared understanding of the "decoded" message along
various lines would be quite complicated (IMAP
somewhat does that, I guess).
In any case, obviously if you care
On 2017-06-12 20:35:42 (+0300), G. Miliotis wrote:
Anyone have any btinternet contact info? I followed this:
http://bt.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/47055/~/bt-email---best-practices-for-postmasters-and-senders-of-bulk-mail
However, their postmaster@ is not
Hello,
Anyone have any btinternet contact info? I followed this:
http://bt.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/47055/~/bt-email---best-practices-for-postmasters-and-senders-of-bulk-mail
However, their postmaster@ is not functional ATM.
postmas...@btinternet.com host mx.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk
We are seeing increased phishing activity from IP’s in 209.85.128.0/17. Whois
data points to Google. When we block by IP it impacts Google's hosting users.
Is anyone else seeing suspect activity from this range? Is there anyone on
this list from Google that could discuss this activity?