On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:40:57 +0200, Thomas Walter wrote:
>As a "free" mail system provider, I'd disable those abandoned accounts
>and not rely on the email senders to track their recipients and stop
>sending mails.
>
>Is there anything wrong with telling the sender: "550 Mailbox abandoned
>for X
On 21.04.19 22:21, Michael Rathbun wrote:
> That's your option, certainly. However, if you run a large "free" mail
> system,
>
> o you discover that up to 80% of the mail you finally accept, filter and
> deliver (store) goes to accounts that have been abandoned. You paid to
> analyze,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:39:48 +0200, Thomas Walter wrote:
>And force people like me to resubscribe every 90 to 180 days, because I
>don't allow tracking nonsense in emails?
That's your option, certainly. However, if you run a large "free" mail
system,
o you discover that up to 80% of the mail
On 21.04.19 21:15, Michael Rathbun wrote:
> Check whether your "non-spam" email is sent only to accounts that have
> subscribed, opened or clicked in the last 90 to 180 days. Utterly and
> absolutely suppress EVERY record that fails that test. It is becoming more
> and more difficult simply to
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 04:52:42 +, Sébastien Riccio
wrote:
>We noticed that near 100% of the complaints are legit mails, almost none of
>them are real SPAM.
Here's another real-world perspective: I have an antique Yahoo! account that
still, after 25 inactive years, gets a wide variety of
On 21/4/2019 07:52, Sébastien Riccio wrote:
We also receive sometime a batch of complaints from the same outlook.com
recipient, for mails dated a few years ago. Like if the user was doing some
cleanup in his inbox and instead of deleting message he declares them as ..
guess it... junk!
This
In article you write:
>We noticed that near 100% of the complaints are legit mails, almost none of
>them are real SPAM.
If you don't send much spam, that's typical. On my small system,
nearly all of the spam reports are people who apparently want to leave
a discussion list about folk dancing.
In article <91d42e7a8e5a4f11a460e310ab40d...@ex1.obs.local> you write:
>How is the filter relevant here ? Doesn't that shows there are some special
>treatment/whitelisting agreement between big ESP?
No, it means that Gmail sends vast amounts of mail and most of it is
not spam. A one message
