> On 12 Feb 2020, at 16:47, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
> wrote:
> Maybe other blacklists isn't a good indicator. But if the IP is not
>> listed in Spamhaus, Spamcop, Sorbs, Proofpoint, Symantec (lately I'm
>> having more issues with Symantec, so I'm not sure how reliable it is
>> anymore),
On 12/02/2020 16:47, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
Does this fly, or am I missing something critical ?
If you block for content or black-listed host and there is a DMARC
reporting address report the appropriate details to the DMARC
reporting address(es) ?
OK, I haven't thought through
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
Look, I understand it's a thin line battling spam and abusive
behavior from mail servers. I've pleaded with many blacklist
operators to give me details as to why they are blacklisting one of
our servers. I can probably count on 1 hand how
On 12 Feb 2020, at 7:02, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Dnia 12.02.2020 o godz. 11:25:39 Laura Atkins via mailop pisze:
Right, but the way around, for bad behavior one should have and
provide
data to prove it.
Why?
Isn't it obvious?
If you are accusing someone of any behaviour, you
On 8 Feb 2020, at 21:45, Simon Lyall via mailop wrote:
> Cutover is probably still a few weeks away.
Step 1 has already happened: Andy Davidson, who originally registered the
domain and has until now provided all the infrastructure for the domain and
list, has handed the domain over to me. I
Anybody got a contact at netclient.no?
They're hiding behind a kafkaesque mail filtering system - and then
recommend registering at http://www.blocklist.eu/ which is impossible
without a Norwegian "Organisasjonsnummer" :(
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
* On Wed, Feb 12 5:03AM Laura Atkins said :
>
> > On 11 Feb 2020, at 17:01, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
> >
> > Well... I guess my thought is, if it takes them a week to weed through all
> > of their requests... maybe there's a better way to optimize this? Or maybe
> > they need more
Dnia 12.02.2020 o godz. 11:25:39 Laura Atkins via mailop pisze:
> > Right, but the way around, for bad behavior one should have and provide
> > data to prove it.
>
>
> Why?
Isn't it obvious?
If you are accusing someone of any behaviour, you should have at least some
evidence to back up your
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:25:39AM +, Laura Atkins wrote:
>
> > On 12 Feb 2020, at 11:15, Johann Klasek via mailop
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:03:52AM +, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
> >>> On 11 Feb 2020, at 17:01, Scott Mutter via mailop
> >>> wrote:
> > [..]
>
> On 12 Feb 2020, at 11:15, Johann Klasek via mailop wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:03:52AM +, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
>>> On 11 Feb 2020, at 17:01, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
> [..]
>>> Your statement is certainly valid, and I don't mean to sound whiny. But it
>>> is
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:03:52AM +, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
> > On 11 Feb 2020, at 17:01, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
[..]
> > Your statement is certainly valid, and I don't mean to sound whiny. But it
> > is also frustrating when providers (usually large providers, like AT)
>
> On 11 Feb 2020, at 17:01, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
>
> Well... I guess my thought is, if it takes them a week to weed through all of
> their requests... maybe there's a better way to optimize this? Or maybe they
> need more personnel manning these positions?
>
> Your statement is
12 matches
Mail list logo