Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

On 7 May 2020 15:14:10 -0400, John Levine via mailop wrote: >Maybe I'm lucky but I haven't had much trouble. My users do know that should >there be problems, it won't be pretty. Aye. Anybody can send any mail from any address to any address through this system. They just have to have opened

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Re: Outlook Insufficient system resources

The issue is being investigated… Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Open a ticket for Hotmail ? From: mailop On Behalf Of David Malagon via mailop Sent: Thursday, May 7,

Re: [mailop] [OFF TOPIC] Any WindStream abuse team members on here?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 23:39 -0500, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote: > > The one we see from that group is 183.136.225.44, currently knocking > at the > door but being halted by the "all 183.128.0.0/11 refuse" rule. 183.136.225.45 and

Re: [mailop] Yahoo(VMG) FBLs down?

This is working again from what I am hearing. Lili Crowley Postmaster Verizon Media On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:41 AM Lili Crowley wrote: > I'm checking into this now > > Thanks for the heads up > > Lili > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:40 AM Nick Schafer via mailop > wrote: > >> Seeing reports

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

In article <20200507171907.gc25...@acrasis.net> you write: >On 2020-05-07 18:07 BST, John Levine via mailop wrote: >> My users have lots of addresses and my mail system lets them use >> whatever From: address they want. > >Interesting. That seems liberal, and also risky isn't it? What's the

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

On 2020-05-07 10:19 a.m., Nick via mailop wrote: On 2020-05-07 18:07 BST, John Levine via mailop wrote: My users have lots of addresses and my mail system lets them use whatever From: address they want. Interesting. That seems liberal, and also risky isn't it? What's the advantage that

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

On 2020-05-07 18:07 BST, John Levine via mailop wrote: > My users have lots of addresses and my mail system lets them use > whatever From: address they want. Interesting. That seems liberal, and also risky isn't it? What's the advantage that makes up for the risk (if you agree there is some)?

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

In article <20200507110617.ga25...@acrasis.net> you write: >On 2020-05-07 11:04 BST, Evan Booyens via mailop wrote: >> Often the hacked account is used to send mail from a spoofed domain. > >Why would an email provider permit its users to spoof either the >mail-from or the header-form? My users

Re: [mailop] SNDS Down?

Yes, it does work now for me as well. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Mike Hammett via mailop" To: mailop@mailop.org Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 7:56:02 AM Subject: [mailop] SNDS

Re: [mailop] [External] SNDS Down?

SNDS works for me as well. Udeme On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:52 AM Kevin A. McGrail via mailop < mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > On 5/7/2020 8:56 AM, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote: > > Is SNDS down? I'm unable to login. > > I just logged into it and it worked. >

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application {dkim-fail}

On 2020-05-07 15:36 BST, Ned Freed via mailop wrote: > > On 2020-05-07 11:04 BST, Evan Booyens via mailop wrote: > > > Often the hacked account is used to send mail from a spoofed domain. > > > Why would an email provider permit its users to spoof either the > > mail-from or the header-form? > >

Re: [mailop] [External] SNDS Down?

On 5/7/2020 8:56 AM, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote: > Is SNDS down? I'm unable to login.  > I just logged into it and it worked.  ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Yahoo(VMG) FBLs down?

Hi Lili! #waving On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:45 AM Lili Crowley via mailop wrote: > I'm checking into this now > > Thanks for the heads up > > Lili > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:40 AM Nick Schafer via mailop > wrote: > >> Seeing reports from various ESPs that FBLs reports aren't being received,

Re: [mailop] Yahoo(VMG) FBLs down?

I'm checking into this now Thanks for the heads up Lili On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:40 AM Nick Schafer via mailop wrote: > Seeing reports from various ESPs that FBLs reports aren't being received, > starting around 23:00 UTC. > > Best, > > Nick Schafer > Manager of Deliverability & Compliance,

Re: [mailop] SNDS Down?

And it's up again here in NL too. Cheers, Ewald On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 16:20, Annex Ian wrote: > hi there, > > we're able to login an we can use the service here from austria. > > best regards, > > christian > -- > *Von:* mailop im Auftrag von Ewald Kessler | >

Re: [mailop] SNDS Down?

SNDS is working fine for me here from Chicago. Maybe it's back up now. Cheers, Al Iverson On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:29 AM Annex Ian via mailop wrote: > hi there, > > we're able to login an we can use the service here from austria. > > best regards, > > christian >

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application {dkim-fail}

> On 2020-05-07 11:04 BST, Evan Booyens via mailop wrote: > > Often the hacked account is used to send mail from a spoofed domain. > Why would an email provider permit its users to spoof either the > mail-from or the header-form? Mailing lists work a lot better if you don't mess with the

[mailop] SNDS Down?

Yes , its down. We're sorry! An error has occurred. Please return to the SNDS home page and try your request again. If you still get this page, you can contact us at msn-s...@microsoft.com. -- *Emre ÜST* Deliverability Team

Re: [mailop] SNDS Down?

We get "We're sorry! An error has occurred." on every page. On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 15:05, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote: > Is SNDS down? I'm unable to login. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > >

[mailop] Yahoo(VMG) FBLs down?

Seeing reports from various ESPs that FBLs reports aren't being received, starting around 23:00 UTC. Best, Nick Schafer Manager of Deliverability & Compliance, Mailgun ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

[mailop] SNDS Down?

Is SNDS down? I'm unable to login. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Outlook Insufficient system resources

Hello David , Mails disappeared for a while. But recently it reached the top . Also office365 was affected by this issue By the way we are getting *new Errors* like ; Error: "450 4.7.3 Organization queue quota exceeded. [ AM6EUR05HT149.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com] [

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

On 2020-05-07 11:04 BST, Evan Booyens via mailop wrote: > Often the hacked account is used to send mail from a spoofed domain. Why would an email provider permit its users to spoof either the mail-from or the header-form? -- Nick ___ mailop mailing

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

Dnia 7.05.2020 o godz. 10:29:53 Evan Booyens via mailop pisze: > > It seems it would be better to apply DMARC if either DKIM or SPF > fail, thus not weakening SPF. There was recently a discussion on Postfix mailing list just about a similar topic. To summarize it shortly, your suggestion is

Re: [mailop] Outlook Insufficient system resources

Hello Here, many errors like this and also missing emails during this and the past week, we have detected that in some 250 OK response messages from Outlook messages are missing. It looks like that there is some issue on Microsoft side, but it lasts for two weeks now, from what I see in other

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

On 5/7/20 11:08 AM, Christian Mack via mailop wrote: Hello Am 07.05.20 um 10:29 schrieb Evan Booyens via mailop: According to DMARC doc's, email should obey DMARC policy if either SPF or DKIM pass. This leads to a situation where a hijacked mailbox can send out spam which is accepted when

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

Hello Am 07.05.20 um 10:29 schrieb Evan Booyens via mailop: According to DMARC doc's, email should obey DMARC policy if either SPF or DKIM pass. This leads to a situation where a hijacked mailbox can send out spam which is accepted when SPF fails as DKIM passes. Any comments. Am I

[mailop] DMARC policy application

Dear list members According to DMARC doc's, email should obey DMARC policy if either SPF or DKIM pass. This leads to a situation where a hijacked mailbox can send out spam which is accepted when SPF fails as DKIM passes. Any comments. Am I misunderstanding the DMARC policy ? It seems it