On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:08:16 -0800 (PST), Ned Freed via mailop
wrote:
>Speaking as someone who has been using +subaddress forms extensively for >25
>years, the main problem is broken web forms that don't handle +'s well. Maybe
>now that Exchange online supports it there will be some impetus to
> It seems I missed the announcement, but ...
> Plus Addressing in Exchange Online | Microsoft
>
In article
you write:
>Is there anyone else who does NOT support it at this point?
Some use other syntax, e.g. user-ext@domain or ext@user.domain
>Are there any major senders who don't like a "+" in the username of an email
>address?
>And if so, why?
No, but there are plenty of cruddy web
That had me laughing, sounded like the geekiest thing I’ve heard in awhile, but
I definitely agree.
+ addressing is useful as hell for most people.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
> On Feb 3, 2021, at 8:31 PM, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
>
>
> It seems I missed
It seems I missed the announcement, but ...
Plus Addressing in Exchange Online | Microsoft
This one was almost too funny, as in it's list of To addresses, almost
all the emails were related to addresses used to report malware.. looks
like an infosec member might have their email compromised, and took
advantage of their address books.. but when you see a recipient list
with 100's of
On 2/3/2021 10:06 AM, Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:
On 2/3/2021 8:57 AM, Kevin A. McGrail via mailop wrote:
Hello all, if anyone from AT is here, the @mms.att.net gateway to
email is using an SPF record with ?ALL [ip4:166.216.152.0/24 ?all]
and blocked by invaluement RBL.
Kevin,
It was 1 IP
On 2/3/2021 8:57 AM, Kevin A. McGrail via mailop wrote:
Hello all, if anyone from AT is here, the @mms.att.net gateway to
email is using an SPF record with ?ALL [ip4:166.216.152.0/24 ?all] and
blocked by invaluement RBL.
Kevin,
It was 1 IP that had gotten listed at invaluement, /not/ a /24
Hello all, if anyone from AT is here, the @mms.att.net gateway to
email is using an SPF record with ?ALL [ip4:166.216.152.0/24 ?all] and
blocked by invaluement RBL.
Regards,
KAM
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
