Re: [mailop] smtp dane/tlsa

2022-09-03 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022, Carl Byington via mailop wrote: > A former client was trying to setup Fedora 36 sendmail with dane > validation. F36 comes with sendmail 8.17.1 which is supposed to support > dane, but they get verify=fail talking to my mail servers. So I googled If would have been nice if

Re: [mailop] SMTP noise from *.bouncer.cloud

2022-09-03 Thread Jarland Donnell via mailop
I think it's fair to say that there is "some" room for nuance on cold email, but the reason I don't allow it on my platform and I actively work to block companies that do, is simply this: There is absolutely no one out there looking for help to send a cold email that isn't sending spam. I

Re: [mailop] SMTP noise from *.bouncer.cloud

2022-09-03 Thread Carl Byington via mailop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 00:43 +0200, Radek Kaczynski via mailop wrote: > If any of you would like to get a full list of our IP addresses and > domains so that you can block Bouncer's requests - please feel free to > email me at ra...@usebouncer.com.

Re: [mailop] smtp dane/tlsa

2022-09-03 Thread Carl Byington via mailop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 2022-09-03 at 17:41 +, ml+mailop--- via mailop wrote: > How did you notice that "something is now broken"? A former client was trying to setup Fedora 36 sendmail with dane validation. F36 comes with sendmail 8.17.1 which is supposed to

Re: [mailop] SMTP noise from *.bouncer.cloud

2022-09-03 Thread Radek Kaczynski via mailop
Good evening, I feel like I need to come clean on the Bouncer - Woodpecker association and my perspective on cold email. (But please let me know if my responses are not welcome - I feel here like a guest, and I don’t want to abuse your hospitality) Long story short - when working for Mack

Re: [mailop] smtp dane/tlsa

2022-09-03 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
How did you notice that "something is now broken"? "works for me" - I just tried it with an MTA that supports DANE: server=172.102.240.42, starttls=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, verify=DANE_SEC, cert_subject=/CN=mail3.five-ten-sg.com, cert_issuer=/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=R3,

[mailop] Anyone have a contact for Cloudmark CSI

2022-09-03 Thread admin admin via mailop
Can anyone here point me to a contact for dealing with a problem regarding Cloudmark CSI. I tried their website for support but they have not replied. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] smtp dane/tlsa

2022-09-03 Thread Slavko via mailop
Dňa 3. septembra 2022 9:17:41 UTC používateľ Simon Arlott via mailop napísal: >Looks like the latest version of this (https://github.com/shuque/gotls) >returns the reason why it fails, which appears to be a bug in the tool >caused by the expired DST X3 CA: > >Result: FAILED: DANE TLS error:

Re: [mailop] smtp dane/tlsa

2022-09-03 Thread Simon Arlott via mailop
On 02/09/2022 16:16, Carl Byington via mailop wrote: > Years ago I setup automation for tlsa records to support smtp dane here. > However, something is now broken, and I am not sure what is wrong. > > _25._tcp.mail3.five-ten-sg.com. IN TLSA 3 0 1 ( >

[mailop] mailop charter (Was: SMTP noise from *.bouncer.cloud)

2022-09-03 Thread Thomas Walter via mailop
Hello Christopher, On 03.09.22 00:13, Christopher Hawker via mailop wrote: Seems like a whole lot of bitching and whinging is going on here regarding bouncer.cloud. Pretty sure this is a mail operations list, not a “let’s whinge and complain about mail services” list On