Re: [mailop] Yahoo.com/frontiernet.net delivery delays

2015-06-03 Thread Hugo Slabbert
Same: relay=mta5.am0.yahoodns.net[98.136.217.203]:25, delay=513, delays=505/0/6/2.3, dsn=4.3.2, status=deferred (host mta5.am0.yahoodns.net[98.136.217.203] said: 451 4.3.2 Internal error reading data (in reply to MAIL FROM command)) -- Hugo -Original Message- Date: Wed, 3 Jun

Re: [mailop] Blog: Logjam, Openssl and Email Deliverability

2015-06-30 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Tue 2015-Jun-30 01:04:48 +0200, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote: That said, so far today, only 0.015% of our outbound messages that were over an encrypted link were using SSLv3. At our volume, that's not nothing, unfortunately, but it's a pretty small amount to allow to

Re: [mailop] MailFoundry Replacement?

2015-08-05 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Wed 2015-Aug-05 20:47:43 +, Michael Wise michael.w...@microsoft.com wrote: We do, however, support On Prem servers way beyond 10k users. I'm confused. No hardware or software required to install, manage, and maintain, which minimizes up-front investment.[1] Microsoft Exchange

Re: [mailop] Strange Gmail IPv6 rejects?

2015-10-08 Thread Hugo Slabbert
That's a decent chunk of redacted going on there... What's in the smtp path after the message leaves mail.redacted.com? Does mail.redacted.com relay out directly? Is it configured to smarthost through something else? Further more, The "From" address below (The 2602:306 one) isn't even in our

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote: On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote: Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com? First, it was a

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

2016-06-10 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Fri 2016-Jun-10 12:32:20 -0600, Tim Starr wrote: I am not saying this is a good idea, but it sounds to me like what would fit the bill here would be a new folder for each user called "Bounced" in which they would see all messages sent to their email address but which

Re: [mailop] Messages over IPv6 rejected by Google for failed authentication checks

2016-06-09 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Thu 2016-Jun-09 18:06:30 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Hi, since around 13:00 UTC today all of the sudden we see massive rejects of mails towards Google when delivering on IPv6 Jun 9 15:12:07 lxmhs52 postfix-postout/smtp[50664]: 3rQQgp3VQTzyWn:

Re: [mailop] Messages over IPv6 rejected by Google for failed authentication checks

2016-06-09 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Thu 2016-Jun-09 18:21:17 +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: Hi, since around 13:00 UTC today all of the sudden we see massive rejects of mails towards Google when delivering on IPv6 Jun 9 15:12:07 lxmhs52 postfix-postout/smtp[50664]: 3rQQgp3VQTzyWn:

Re: [mailop] Webmail

2016-04-04 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Mon 2016-Apr-04 12:34:19 +0100, Stuart Paton wrote: Roundcube is used a fair bit out there but after working for Cloudmark for 8 years in the email security area I am now at Open-Xchange. OX offer a pretty compelling webmail offering - very google apps or

Re: [mailop] domain research tools?

2016-07-28 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Thu 2016-Jul-28 09:05:22 -0600, Anne Mitchell wrote: … I just call `whois` from BASH and pipe the results into `less`. I do this too, except I use 'more'. Is there a quantifiable difference between 'less' and 'more'? Or, perhaps, less is more? ;-) In a matter