Re: [mailop] tiscali.it/tiscalinet.it reject RFC821 FROM domain as a CNAME because "domain does not have neither a valid MX or A record"

2024-02-29 Thread David Conrad via mailop
> and lastly cname breaks dnssec, Err, what? CNAME works fine with DNSSEC. CNAME at zone apex with other RR types can break DNSSEC since CNAME with other RRs at the same label (anywhere) isn’t supposed to work. However, since people want to do it, some folks have come up with solutions that

Re: [mailop] Legit-looking mail to the wrong address with no unsubscribe

2023-08-25 Thread David Conrad via mailop
ies (-> French overseas departments!) > and would file a complaint with the appropriate DPA, RBC better sets aside a > bit of money already. Even more so as they have been flagged multiple times > already, in this instance by you, David. > > Cheers, > > -C. > > On 2

Re: [mailop] Legit-looking mail to the wrong address with no unsubscribe

2023-08-24 Thread David Conrad via mailop
If the address isn’t a “no-reply@“, I generally do the same, but more and more I’m getting “this message is sent from an unmonitored email address, please do not reply”. The worst so far is Royal Bank of Canada. One of their customers used my gmail address and I’ve been getting all sorts of

Re: [mailop] Mail Sending Self-Test Platform

2023-03-03 Thread David Conrad via mailop
This kind of comment isn’t particularly useful as it appears to be a statement of an opinion with no explanation/justification. DNSSEC is a different PKI. Like everything, it has pros and cons. Whether it is better or worse depends on what you’re looking at. If you believe MTA-STS is superior,

Re: [mailop] Amazon, what every happened to trace headers?

2022-03-30 Thread David Conrad via mailop
Well, there is a new guy at Amazon that might be a bit more amenable to anti-spam efforts… :) https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulvixie/ Regards, -drc > On Mar 30, 2022, at 12:04 PM, Rob McEwen via mailop wrote: > > On 3/30/2022 2:42 PM, Michael

Re: [mailop] Null MX & Preference

2016-07-15 Thread David Conrad
Michael, On Jul 15, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Any one suggest a medium to encourage that amongst registrars? http://icannregistrars.org http://gnso.icann.org/en/about/stakeholders-constituencies/rrsg Regards, -drc (ICANN CTO, but speaking only for

Re: [mailop] 'x-originating-ip' is [25.162.68.132] ?

2016-07-15 Thread David Conrad
Hi, On Jul 15, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Michael Wise via mailop wrote: > Every so often we need to (re-)?explain this. > That block, 25/8, is not in fact announced by anyone. Perhaps not right now... > Not the UK Ministry of Defense. > Not Microsoft. > Not Nobody.