Atro Tossavainen via mailop writes:
>> We handle an email forwarder. Recently, we have been having more and
>> more issues with people reporting forwarded emails as spam, that end up
>> (probably) deteriorating the reputation of our email servers.
>
> You could ask the good folks at iki.fi for
users who think the spam button is the same thing as the delete button.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:16 AM Leo Gaspard via mailop
> wrote:
>
>> Michael Peddemors via mailop writes:
>> > Since every email client in the world can check multiple mailboxes, ISPs
>&g
Michael Peddemors via mailop writes:
> Since every email client in the world can check multiple mailboxes, ISPs
> and Telco's are starting to simply turn off 'remote forwarding', it is
> an option for you of course.
Unfortunately, this is not really a reasonable course of action for us:
most
Hello all,
We handle an email forwarder. Recently, we have been having more and
more issues with people reporting forwarded emails as spam, that end up
(probably) deteriorating the reputation of our email servers.
We have already set up:
- an antispam, but some emails marked as spam are even to
Steve Atkins via mailop writes:
>> On May 10, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Leo Gaspard via mailop
>> wrote:
>> Laura Atkins via mailop writes:
>>> For victims of listbombing, COI isn’t an answer. In fact, much of the
>>> problem with listbombing is COI mail.
&g
Laura Atkins via mailop writes:
> For victims of listbombing, COI isn’t an answer. In fact, much of the problem
> with listbombing is COI mail.
>
> How do you propose to address that issue?
Captchas are a way to force the malicious subscriber to spend human or
computer time breaking it (if
"Bill Cole" writes:
> I know from doing it that limbo-free email can be done well enough
> (minimal bad mail being delivered or good mail being rejected) that
> paying users will come to prefer it over freemail-like service. That
> service model lacks significant economies of scale (and arguably
On 05/25/2018 12:14 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
> Yes, dealing with exactly the same kind of problem(s). One of my
> customers asks me to sign for the fact that mail is encrypted when
> handling it. However, using standard MTA software, messages that are in
> the queue waiting to get delivered,
to happen any time soon, so…
> Brandon
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:35 PM Leo Gaspard via mailop <mailop@mailop.org
> <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2018 08:45 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:> Kinda, yes. Anyone
> running a non-compliant l
On 04/09/2018 08:45 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:> Kinda, yes. Anyone
running a non-compliant list server should look to
> how other list servers are making themselves compliant. Could be...
> 1) rewrite headers
> 2) not break DKIM
> 3) ARC?
> I don't want to be overly prescriptive (no one in
10 matches
Mail list logo
