> I'm working with a non-profit company that would like to use an e-mail
> campaign system.
I spent a while evaluating a few of these for a local non-profit group.
I eventually settled on https://emailoctopus.com/
I'm really pleased with it: it works well and has a nice user interface.
Having
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:24:17 -0700 Jaren Angerbauer wrote:
> Got your first email this morning :)
>
> Will respond to you in a bit.
Brilliant, thanks Jaren. Sorry, I didn't want to assume you were on
standby for an instant response ;-)
Andy
___
mailop
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing any problems delivering to domains hosted at
Proofpoint?
We're seeing most (but not all) of our emails deferred, with a message
to check the sending IP address at ipcheck.proofpoint.com. When we do
that, the IP addresses are reported as not blocked.
E.g.
A bit of a long shot, but does anyone have a contact at qq.com /
Tencent Mail?
We moved outbound IP address a few months ago, and the only provider
that we are still needing to deliver to using the old IP addresses is
qq.com, which is rate-limiting the new range with the messages:
"550 Ip
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:04:04 -0500 Dave Shevett wrote:
> Does anyone know of a hosting company that uses mailman (or something
> roughly equivalent) and doesn't cost an arm and a leg? We're a social
> community that uses the mailing list for internal dicusssions - this
> isn't customer facing
Dear all,
Is there anyone that can help with a Rackspace delivery problem please?
We're moving IP addresses and are having trouble with getting anything
other than a tiny trickle of email delivered from the new IP space
(78.143.254.0/24). I've tried postmas...@emailsrvr.com but have
received no
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:13:34 -0500 Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
> Anybody else who is bored, feel free to share your telnet test
> results
From the very same server, I get different results depending on which
local IP address I bind to. If I bind to an IP address which regularly
sends email
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:28:27 + mailop@mailop.org wrote:
> Which ESP does 100% (double/confirmed) opt in?
We do by default. We then allow a customer to request that the opt-in
requirement be relaxed. Of course, we can't guarantee that what a
customer tells us is true when we process this
On Wed, 03 Jul 2019 22:52:21 +0800 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
> The factory that made IPv4 addresses has been closed for a while. They
> don't make new IPv4 addresses any longer. I don't believe "completely
> clean" IPv4 address space exists anywhere. Certainly in the RIPE
> region, all
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:19:03 +0100 (BST) Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Simplelists - Andrew Beverley via mailop wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm after some general advice about moving to a new outbound email IP
> > address range.
> >
> &
Dear all,
I'm after some general advice about moving to a new outbound email IP
address range.
We have a choice of either applying for a brand new range from RIPE
(which has presumably never been used before to send email), or buying
an existing block that may have been used.
Would it be better
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:52:08 + Sébastien Riccio wrote:
> So we forwarded the information to the sender for their information.
> Their recipient replied to our customer they did not flagged this
> message as SPAM at all and that only one message was in their spambox
> and it went there
Replied off-list.
Andy
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 13:00:48 +1000
Mark Dale via mailop wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Do you have a contact at Cox? We haven't had any response from their
> postmaster address.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> Original Message ----
> Fr
mising anything but I might be
> > able to dig in to the data and see if anything useful can be found
> > related to your sends.
> >
> > On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 08:25, Simplelists - Andrew Beverley via mailop
> > mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
> >
Hi,
Does anyone have any contacts at cox.net please? We are seeing 452
error code CXMXRT when trying to deliver (meaning "The email sender has
exceeded the maximum number of sent email allowed"), despite throttling
delivery down to 1 email every 12 seconds.
Many thanks,
Andy
Hi,
Is there anyone here who can help with delivery problems to tds.net?
I have tried postmas...@tds.net but I get:
postmas...@tds.net (reading confirmation): 554 5.4.6 mail loop detected
And their online forms seem to be orientated towards their own users.
Thanks,
Andy
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:06:41 + Michael Wise wrote:
> The one guaranteed way to get traffic delivered to the INBOX is for
> the recipient to SafeSender the domains.
Just to clarify, does this have to be the domain in the RFC822-From
address? Or can it be another header such as
17 matches
Mail list logo
