Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: Are there any de facto standards around no-reply@ addresses?

2019-04-11 Thread thomasm-mailop
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:58:18AM +0200, Thomas Walter wrote: > There's always the option to have a noreply address that is a regular > mailbox. Just saying... ;) I remember at least one person who deliberately used noreply@his.domain as his regular address, claiming that spammers might weed

Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: Are there any de facto standards around no-reply@ addresses?

2019-04-11 Thread Thomas Walter
On 11.04.19 09:51, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> I hold a very low opinion of any business entity that sends me automated >> email and either deliberately chooses to ignore my reply or forces me to >> jump through hoops in order to reply via a web form or such. > > Amen to that. There's always

Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: Are there any de facto standards around no-reply@ addresses?

2019-04-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
> I hold a very low opinion of any business entity that sends me automated > email and either deliberately chooses to ignore my reply or forces me to > jump through hoops in order to reply via a web form or such. Amen to that. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin