On Thu 06/Feb/2020 19:37:39 +0100 Patrick Ben Koetter via mailop wrote:
>
> why is it that everyone is still using noreply addresses to send notifications
> and other one-way messages?
>
> [...]
>
> - It allows to apply a DKIM signature thus allowing to align with DMARC
> policy.
DKIM has
Two immediate reasons come to mind as to why I wouldn't use a null sender--
1. The common expectation is that null sender = NDR.
2. It would also prevent you from tracking some bounces -- i.e., it's
incompatible with VERP.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:44 PM Patrick Ben Koetter via mailop
wrote:
>
>
Dnia 6.02.2020 o godz. 19:37:39 Patrick Ben Koetter via mailop pisze:
> why is it that everyone is still using noreply addresses to send notifications
> and other one-way messages?
Myself, when I'm writing any script that sends automated notifications, I'm
always using some real, replyable
Greetings,
why is it that everyone is still using noreply addresses to send notifications
and other one-way messages?
It seems to be common understanding to use e.g. nore...@example.com to keep
people from replying to mail from example.com. The typical policy is to reject
or discard any mail
