Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-06 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:52 PM, G. Miliotis wrote: > On 6/4/2016 20:27, Vick Khera wrote: > >> I use google groups for those things. You can have as many of those as >> you like, and they can be configured as shared mailboxes or even a simple >> ticketing system. >> >

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-06 Thread G. Miliotis
On 6/4/2016 20:27, Vick Khera wrote: I use google groups for those things. You can have as many of those as you like, and they can be configured as shared mailboxes or even a simple ticketing system. Jut noting that I have done this and the spam controls for google groups are not the best. You

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
Well, free edition should be limited to 5 accounts, but yeah, $300/year is pricey for consumers, no doubt about that. And I wouldn't call Gmail hobbled, it's just more similar to the consumer version, doesn't add the bells & whistles of the paid version. Though, when you're used to running your

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Dave Warren
I have the old one with 50 accounts. And "hobbled" might be a bit of an exaggeration, but I do run my own servers and I am used to having all sorts of flexibility :) However, hobbled feels right since the features already exist, they're just... well... -- Dave Warren

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
I've tried to make the argument before, I can ping the thread again, but I wouldn't bet on it. I'd probably get the consumer version out first, we'll have to make sure that works with free apps domains as well. I know I'm paying for full Google apps for my personal domain after missing too many

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 2016-04-02 at 09:58 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote: > Is this another one of those fun DNSSEC issues? I'm not particularly > good at reading these, but it looks like the PTR lookup is denied > existence at 136.in-addr.arpa. >

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
details.aspx?id=18275> ? > > > > *From:* Brandon Long [mailto:bl...@google.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2016 4:45 PM > *To:* Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* Pascal Herbert <pascal.herb...@gmail.com>; m...@pixelgate.net; > mailop@mailop.org > > *

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
ed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool > <http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? > > > > *From:* mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] *On Behalf Of *Pascal > Herbert > *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2016 2:45 PM > *To:* m...@pixelgat

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Pascal Herbert
Forgot to mention that. The server only uses ipv4. No ipv6. Pascal On Apr 1, 2016 23:42, "Mark Milhollan" wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Pascal Herbert wrote: > > >Google is currently rejecting mails from some of our servers with: > >The IP address sending this message does

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Michael Wise
ailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Gmail rate limit Hallo, Google is currently rejecting mails from some of our servers with: The IP address sending this message does not have a PTR record. To protect our users from spam, mail sent from your IP address has been temporarily rate limited. t