Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

;da...@mailplus.nl> Cc: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available? On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:49:50AM +0200, David Hofstee wrote: > I’m not sure why you cannot have an autoresponder behind the > abuse@/postmaster@ with a link in it, to a ticket, containing >

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

On 15/9/2015 12:12 πμ, Michael Wise wrote: Sooner or later, your discussions will end there, and the ticketing will begin. There is **NO** way around it; Microsoft Legal has been very clear on the matter. This is interesting, I was just instructed by my server provider to contact

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

mentality.org> Sent: ‎9/‎15/‎2015 12:03 AM To: mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available? On 15/9/2015 12:12 ??, Michael Wise wrote: Sooner or later, your discussions will end there, and the ticketing will begin. There is *NO* wa

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:49:50AM +0200, David Hofstee wrote: > I’m not sure why you cannot have an autoresponder behind the > abuse@/postmaster@ with a link in it, to a ticket, containing > the info sent in the first place. See abuse.io for example. I got ~2,000 spam mails to our abuse address

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

x?id=18275> ? From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Black Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:45 PM To: Brian Curry <bcu...@merkleinc.com>; mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available? Are you a mail producer or a Microsoft

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 2:54 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available? > On Sep 14, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> wrote: > &g

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

mber 14, 2015 2:54 PM > To: mailop@mailop.org > Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available? > > > > On Sep 14, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > > It’s on my bucket list…. > > OTOH, it's a reasonabl

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

That might not be the smartest tactic.. :) * Do you want to be on their radar? They have deep pockets.. * Email operators and end users have protected rights, they can choose to accept/deny based on almost any principle (eg, We don't accept emails from people who's name starts with the

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

> On Sep 3, 2015, at 8:05 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Marc Perkel > wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> I'm having problem with Microsoft too. It's just plain weird. Sometimes it >> takes 6 hours to deliver an email. And I

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

>> Are those complaints or are they DMARC notices? > > complaints, en mass, by a n00b who just returned from vacation and > decided to expeditiously clear out his inbox. :-) He subscribed to > a list on 07-Aug using an outlook.com addr, and again on 27-Aug using > a @yahoo.com addr from a

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

I watch our SNDS, SRD, and complaint data like a hawk and there's no ryhme or reason I've found to match that data to blocks/things going to spam. Things can be great data wise and there's issues and vice versa. The only thing I've found to help is regularly trimming inactive. That does have a

Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Microsoft Contact Available?

> And as someone who's job it is to stop spam, do you really want a lawsuit to > find that a mail service has to accept mail from someone else? Not to mention that Federal law specifically exempts ISPs from any liability for acceptance/delivery decisions they make. Federal law specifically