Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
Sometimes called, "Code Coverage" Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? -Original Message- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rathbun Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:03 AM To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay? On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:53:15 -0500, Al Iverson <aiver...@wombatmail.com<mailto:aiver...@wombatmail.com>> wrote: >I agree 100% here. Could there be a bug? Sure. Is it likely, based on >the data scene so far? No, not really. Agreed. Withal the fact that the platform is nearing the end of a massive conversion/merge suggests above-average weight be given to the "bug" possibility. The platform merge was in its earlier stages when I moved on from Microsoft and EOP, but interesting interactions were surfacing even then. Thinking of a suddenly critical exercise when I was at Ford, "Wait, why would this module suddenly start failing? It's been in the software for over five years!" "Yeah, but parts of the code have never been called on to do this kind of stuff until this module had to interact with the new modules. Some parts of the code apparently never execute at all in the previous environment." mdr -- Fail-safe systems fail by failing to fail safe. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchilli.nosignal.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmailop=02%7C01%7Cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7Cf8690e8b38804d1cffce08d55844b778%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C1%7C636511974516270769=nKh2RG0yEcBuGi2pquGr8Swzp7XqKL4XgyfXmROj8M8%3D=0 ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:59:04 +0200, Sotiris Tsimbonis said: > Hi all, > > I received today (9 Jan 2018) a message from outlook's feedback loop > with a message that was originally sent to a hotmail address on 30 Jan 2017. Just as a gentle reminder - sometimes the Date: is incorrect because the system clock on the box is horribly broken. It's amazing how long stuff runs on autopilot - as of last year, there were still some 800 systems that were pointing NTP at one certain IP address that used to be in my office running a stratum-2 NTP server. The weird part? That box was removed from the public 'clocks.txt' document in 1998 and decommissioned in 1999, the IP never re-used. Think about that for a bit. pgpG44g9l4Lvp.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 09:53:15 -0500, Al Iversonwrote: >I agree 100% here. Could there be a bug? Sure. Is it likely, based on >the data scene so far? No, not really. Agreed. Withal the fact that the platform is nearing the end of a massive conversion/merge suggests above-average weight be given to the "bug" possibility. The platform merge was in its earlier stages when I moved on from Microsoft and EOP, but interesting interactions were surfacing even then. Thinking of a suddenly critical exercise when I was at Ford, "Wait, why would this module suddenly start failing? It's been in the software for over five years!" "Yeah, but parts of the code have never been called on to do this kind of stuff until this module had to interact with the new modules. Some parts of the code apparently never execute at all in the previous environment." mdr -- Fail-safe systems fail by failing to fail safe. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Stefano Bagnarawrote: > On 10 January 2018 at 08:16, Sotiris Tsimbonis wrote: >> [...] They did >> not report it as spam yesterday, they only viewed it. They don't use an >> email client, they only use the web interface provided by hotmail. > > I often heard story like this... the fact is that this "i never marked > it as spam" is always from a non-techie person.. > - Sometimes they lie, because they didn't know you spy on their > "junking habits", so they simply deny when you ask why they did > something they didn't know you could "monitor". > - Sometimes they don't even know what is the spam button (some of them > think it is like trash, some of them don't know at all). > - Sometimes they happen to click on stuff without really recognizing they did. > > We run a SaaS and very often our users say they never did something > until we dig in the logs and have evidence they really did that, so my > first think is always "everybody lies" (sometimes they are not really > aware they are lying, they simply never read/tried to understood and > thought that "permanently delete" means "hide this for a while"). > > It is possible there is a bug in the platform, but I still have to get > similar reports from a trusted source or see the behaviour with my > eyes. So, I think you should take this at least as an option (and use > Occam's razor). I agree 100% here. Could there be a bug? Sure. Is it likely, based on the data scene so far? No, not really. If it were a bug that just viewing an old email triggered a spam report, I think that we ESP platforms would all be flooded with stuff like this, and that's not happening. And users do definitely get confused about this sort of thing. ESPs have to explain FBLs is detail to clients, and not all clients understand it. If a fair number of email sending clients don't understand it, then an even higher number of email receiving end users probably don't understand it. Cheers, Al Iverson -- al iverson // wombatmail // miami http://www.aliverson.com http://www.spamresource.com ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
> It was not on their inbox, so they used search to find all emails from us and last year's email > came up. So they clicked on last year's email and opened it. They did not report it as spam > yesterday, they only viewed it. They don't use an email client, they only use the web interface > provided by hotmail. If you have open tracking with https, you can see in what folder the email was opened (if you log the referer). Yours, David On 10 January 2018 at 08:54, Stefano Bagnarawrote: > On 10 January 2018 at 08:16, Sotiris Tsimbonis wrote: > > [...] They did > > not report it as spam yesterday, they only viewed it. They don't use an > > email client, they only use the web interface provided by hotmail. > > I often heard story like this... the fact is that this "i never marked > it as spam" is always from a non-techie person.. > - Sometimes they lie, because they didn't know you spy on their > "junking habits", so they simply deny when you ask why they did > something they didn't know you could "monitor". > - Sometimes they don't even know what is the spam button (some of them > think it is like trash, some of them don't know at all). > - Sometimes they happen to click on stuff without really recognizing they > did. > > We run a SaaS and very often our users say they never did something > until we dig in the logs and have evidence they really did that, so my > first think is always "everybody lies" (sometimes they are not really > aware they are lying, they simply never read/tried to understood and > thought that "permanently delete" means "hide this for a while"). > > It is possible there is a bug in the platform, but I still have to get > similar reports from a trusted source or see the behaviour with my > eyes. So, I think you should take this at least as an option (and use > Occam's razor). > > > So it's not bulk moving emails to junk using imap. Opening the email > > yesterday triggered the fbl process somehow. > > > > I'm still not quite certain of how it works, but Mihai Costea also > > posted that 1% of their fbl reports are back from 2016 ... > > I don't see anything weird from that. People can mark as spam any > email, even if the email has been received a lot of time ago. > He told that he searched the email, maybe they also marked it as spam: > this kind of action could have the legitimate result to send an FBL > for an old message. > > It sound like an expected distribution: > 0.1% per month (1% in 10 months) 2 years ago > 0.4% per month (4% in 10 months) 1 year ago > 2.5% per month (5% in 2 months) 3 months ago > 90% per month (90% in 1 the last month). > > If you do open-tracking you can see similar distributions with > messages being opened even after many years. If they are opened after > years there's nothing weird to see they are sometimes also marked as > spam after years. > > Stefano > > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > -- -- My opinion is mine. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
On 10 January 2018 at 08:16, Sotiris Tsimboniswrote: > [...] They did > not report it as spam yesterday, they only viewed it. They don't use an > email client, they only use the web interface provided by hotmail. I often heard story like this... the fact is that this "i never marked it as spam" is always from a non-techie person.. - Sometimes they lie, because they didn't know you spy on their "junking habits", so they simply deny when you ask why they did something they didn't know you could "monitor". - Sometimes they don't even know what is the spam button (some of them think it is like trash, some of them don't know at all). - Sometimes they happen to click on stuff without really recognizing they did. We run a SaaS and very often our users say they never did something until we dig in the logs and have evidence they really did that, so my first think is always "everybody lies" (sometimes they are not really aware they are lying, they simply never read/tried to understood and thought that "permanently delete" means "hide this for a while"). It is possible there is a bug in the platform, but I still have to get similar reports from a trusted source or see the behaviour with my eyes. So, I think you should take this at least as an option (and use Occam's razor). > So it's not bulk moving emails to junk using imap. Opening the email > yesterday triggered the fbl process somehow. > > I'm still not quite certain of how it works, but Mihai Costea also > posted that 1% of their fbl reports are back from 2016 ... I don't see anything weird from that. People can mark as spam any email, even if the email has been received a lot of time ago. He told that he searched the email, maybe they also marked it as spam: this kind of action could have the legitimate result to send an FBL for an old message. It sound like an expected distribution: 0.1% per month (1% in 10 months) 2 years ago 0.4% per month (4% in 10 months) 1 year ago 2.5% per month (5% in 2 months) 3 months ago 90% per month (90% in 1 the last month). If you do open-tracking you can see similar distributions with messages being opened even after many years. If they are opened after years there's nothing weird to see they are sometimes also marked as spam after years. Stefano ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
On 9/1/18 21:12, Al Iverson wrote: > Likely the user reported it as spam in the last 24 hours. No ISP is > knowingly sitting on complaints for almost a year. > > You'll probably never know for sure unless you were to ask that user > (and assuming that you will trust their answer). We actually contacted the user and asked. Their story goes like this: Yesterday they were looking for an email from us, which was supposed to arrive yesterday (it was a contract renewal). It was not on their inbox, so they used search to find all emails from us and last year's email came up. So they clicked on last year's email and opened it. They did not report it as spam yesterday, they only viewed it. They don't use an email client, they only use the web interface provided by hotmail. So it's not bulk moving emails to junk using imap. Opening the email yesterday triggered the fbl process somehow. I'm still not quite certain of how it works, but Mihai Costea also posted that 1% of their fbl reports are back from 2016 ... Sotiris. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Bill Colewrote: > On 9 Jan 2018, at 14:53, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> Also, another user here reported that recently Microsoft introduced >> automations so that an user moving messages from inbox to spam via >> IMAP (also in bulk) automatically create abuse reports/FBL. > > That's horrifying. It's oblivious bulk misreporting by conscious design. And yours is hyperbole, overstating an opinion grossly in an attempt to draw a response. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
On 9 Jan 2018, at 14:53, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Also, another user here reported that recently Microsoft introduced > automations so that an user moving messages from inbox to spam via > IMAP (also in bulk) automatically create abuse reports/FBL. That's horrifying. It's oblivious bulk misreporting by conscious design. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
That last bit should only be for Office365 accounts ... I think. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? -Original Message- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Bagnara Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:54 AM To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay? On 9 January 2018 at 19:59, Sotiris Tsimbonis <sts...@x33.gr<mailto:sts...@x33.gr>> wrote: > I received today (9 Jan 2018) a message from outlook's feedback loop > with a message that was originally sent to a hotmail address on 30 Jan 2017. > [...] > Is it because the hotmail user marked it as spam today? Most likely. Sometimes an use mark as spam something received today and the UI let him mark as spam all of the previous email from the same sender, so you get FBL for dozens email to the same recipient. Also, another user here reported that recently Microsoft introduced automations so that an user moving messages from inbox to spam via IMAP (also in bulk) automatically create abuse reports/FBL. Stefano -- Stefano Bagnara Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchilli.nosignal.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmailop=02%7C01%7Cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7Cb1c005951ddb42a8608708d5579bab90%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C1%7C636511248473790819=jkhNQyuWgs%2F%2FqPA%2FDtAfpTQVxyauUEaJDBXWvPNzRXU%3D=0 ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
Likely the user reported it as spam in the last 24 hours. No ISP is knowingly sitting on complaints for almost a year. You'll probably never know for sure unless you were to ask that user (and assuming that you will trust their answer). Cheers, Al Iverson On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Sotiris Tsimboniswrote: > Hi all, > > I received today (9 Jan 2018) a message from outlook's feedback loop > with a message that was originally sent to a hotmail address on 30 Jan 2017. > > Can someone explain why I've received it so late, almost a year after it > was sent? > > Is it because the hotmail user marked it as spam today? > Did the hotmail user mark it as spam earlier but was processed by > hotmail today? > Did the user do nothing, but hotmail's own processing classified it as > spam almost a year after it was received? > Something else? > > Kind regards, > Sotiris. > > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop -- al iverson // wombatmail // miami http://www.aliverson.com http://www.spamresource.com ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
[mailop] Hotmail/Outlook feedback loop processing delay?
Hi all, I received today (9 Jan 2018) a message from outlook's feedback loop with a message that was originally sent to a hotmail address on 30 Jan 2017. Can someone explain why I've received it so late, almost a year after it was sent? Is it because the hotmail user marked it as spam today? Did the hotmail user mark it as spam earlier but was processed by hotmail today? Did the user do nothing, but hotmail's own processing classified it as spam almost a year after it was received? Something else? Kind regards, Sotiris. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop