In article <20200722205656.gb2...@jumper.schlittermann.de> you write:
>> Following your logic, I also tried out "zrdtest.com" and it seems to do
>> the same.
>
>Interesting, even it is not mentioned in RFC5782.
The point of TEST and INVALID is that they can never be real domains in the DNS.
Chris via mailop (Di 21 Jul 2020 23:50:55 CEST):
> dbltest.com does work for dbl. Does it not work for zrd?
As pointed out in the other response: zrdtest.com works, as well as the
RFC5782 suggested domain "test".
> I think you meant ..zrd.dqs.spamhaus.net, right?
Yes, typo. Thanks. .net
Atro Tossavainen via mailop (Di 21 Jul 2020 23:16:59 CEST):
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:57:05PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop
> wrote:
> > zrd..dbl.dqs.spamhaus.com?
>
> RFC 5782 suggests that all domain name DNSBLs should have an entry
> for "test".
Thanks. The pointer to the RFC was
dbltest.com does work for dbl. Does it not work for zrd?
I think you meant ..zrd.dqs.spamhaus.net, right?
On 2020-07-20 10:57, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
Hi,
I think, that queries for theses (A, TXT) records can be used to
find if the blacklist is working:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:57:05PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think, that queries for theses (A, TXT) records can be used to
> find if the blacklist is working:
>
> 2.0.0.127..zen.dqs.spamhaus.net
> dbltest.com..dbl.dqs.spamhaus.net
>
> Is anybody aware
Hi,
I think, that queries for theses (A, TXT) records can be used to
find if the blacklist is working:
2.0.0.127..zen.dqs.spamhaus.net
dbltest.com..dbl.dqs.spamhaus.net
Is anybody aware of a domain that can be used for
zrd..dbl.dqs.spamhaus.com?
Thank you.
Best regards from
