On 3/4/2024 4:50 AM, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
but I don't relish trying to navigate inevitable issues
of disagreement between us all on what is actually best practice
Perhaps when there are significant constituencies for competing choices,
merely add a comment about it, explaining the
On Mon 04/03/2024 at 12:50, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> This best practices document is going to get out of date and be hard
> to maintain. Maybe we should make it a wiki? I am happy to help
> technically but I don't relish trying to navigate inevitable issues
> of disagreement between us all
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:12:43AM +0100, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Am 04.03.2024 um 02:25:08 Uhr schrieb Gareth Evans via mailop:
> > From
> >
> > https://www.mailop.org/best-practices
> >
> > "Having SPF for your own domains is usually considered a weak signal
> > ..."
> >
> >
Am 04.03.2024 um 02:25:08 Uhr schrieb Gareth Evans via mailop:
> From
>
> https://www.mailop.org/best-practices
>
> "Having SPF for your own domains is usually considered a weak signal
> ..."
>
> Eh?
That sounds completely wrong. SPF makes forging the MAIL FROM: address
much harder. Some
From
https://www.mailop.org/best-practices
"Having SPF for your own domains is usually considered a weak signal ..."
Eh?
"... as is filtering on them"
Such as DNS filtering per
https://www.ionos.co.uk/digitalguide/server/security/dns-filtering ?
Can anyone add a little more
