On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 3:56 PM Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
> > What is this current attitude on using something like
> > Postfix's `reject_unverified_recipient`?
>
> ONLY use this when you are relaying for specific domains that you
> service where you do not have any way to obtain a definitive
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 02:49:12PM -0600, Jesse Hathaway via mailop wrote:
> Does probing for recipients work these days, is it considered abusive?
It rarely works they way you might hope. And yes, we consider it
abusive.
PG
___
mailop mailing list
Dňa 16. februára 2024 21:03:18 UTC používateľ Marco Moock via mailop
napísal:
>Use the VRFY SMTP command for that. If the remote site doesn't provide
>it, they don't want that somebody probes for the mailboxes.
IMO only between own servers, if at all. Disabling it (for public access)
is
On 2024-02-16 at 15:49:12 UTC-0500 (Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:49:12 -0600)
Jesse Hathaway via mailop
is rumored to have said:
What is this current attitude on using something like
Postfix's `reject_unverified_recipient`?
ONLY use this when you are relaying for specific domains that you
service
Am Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:49:12 -0600
schrieb Jesse Hathaway via mailop :
> Does probing for recipients work these days, is it considered abusive?
Use the VRFY SMTP command for that. If the remote site doesn't provide
it, they don't want that somebody probes for the mailboxes.
Some dnsbl (e.g.
What is this current attitude on using something like
Postfix's `reject_unverified_recipient`?
Does probing for recipients work these days, is it considered abusive?
Yours kindly, Jesse Hathaway
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
