Syed Alam writes:
> Since 8th of March we determined an enormous global increase of below
> bounce message from Yahoo MX:
>
> 554 delivery error: dd Sorry, your message to x...@yahoo.com cannot be
> delivered. This mailbox is disabled (554.30). - mta4101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
I've noticed, too.
Good morning!
Anyone from Uniklinik Münster on this list? Please reach out to me. Thanks!
Mit besten Grüßen
Eike Armbrust
Rechenzentrum
Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften
— Hochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbüttel
Rechenzentrum
Salzdahlumer Straße 46/48
38302 Wolfenbüttel
Tel.:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 12:13, Syed Alam wrote:
> Since 8th of March we determined an enormous global increase of below bounce
> message from Yahoo MX:
> 554 delivery error: dd Sorry, your message to x...@yahoo.com cannot be
> delivered. This mailbox is disabled (554.30). -
Hi Everyone,
Yes we seen the same trend. Yahoo has discarded lot of inactive users. We
seen trend specific to the set of customer who do not follow data
segmentation & keep sending to inactive address ( Users who didn't open any
emails in past 180 / 360 days OR no activity on the same account )
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:07:13 +0100, Syed Alam wrote:
>We are assuming it is really a hard bounce and Yahoo is retiring inactive
>addresses. Just a heads up that the bounce rate at Yahoo will most likely
>increase until they mark all these inactive addresses as passive.
Many of the major mailbox
Hi everyone,
Since 8th of March we determined an enormous global increase of below
bounce message from Yahoo MX:
554 delivery error: dd Sorry, your message to x...@yahoo.com cannot be
delivered. This mailbox is disabled (554.30). - mta4101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
We are assuming it is really a
Hello,
Many of the major mailbox providers have stated publicly that it is unwise
> to
> mail to unengaged addresses.
Is there maybe an article where such information is structured? Could be
useful to show that to clients in order to convince them.
>
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 3:28 PM Michael
On 3/18/2019 12:58 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> Reported to our support teams, an over night filter rule update on Cisco
> IronPorts results in messages being modified incorrectly..
> If anyone is trying to deal with increased reports of problems
> sending/receiving email through companies
Hello -
This appears to be a legitimate error, but I am asking our team to double
check.
I will update when I know more.
Thanks.
Lili Crowley
Postmaster
Verizon Media
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:23 AM Michael Rathbun wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:07:13 +0100, Syed Alam
> wrote:
>
> >We are
I’m told they’re on it.
Eliot
> On 19 Mar 2019, at 14:26, John Johnstone
> wrote:
>
> On 3/18/2019 12:58 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote:
>> Reported to our support teams, an over night filter rule update on Cisco
>> IronPorts results in messages being modified incorrectly..
>> If anyone is
10 matches
Mail list logo