Re: [mailop] btinternet.com blacklist

2017-07-10 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:53:55PM +0100, Dom Latter wrote: > On 10/07/17 11:22, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Back during the old nanae and spam-l days in the 90s and 2000s, > > whenever this came up, and it did a lot even with filters a lot less > > hair trigger than what we have today, the

Re: [mailop] Spamassassin // replicate configuration on multiple servers

2017-10-19 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:25:41PM -0300, Emanuel wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to replicate the configuration, ie modify the > configuration file to replicate on the other servers that share the > cloud, or generate a shared database? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible_(software) B.

Re: [mailop] Lots of spam from gmail ?

2018-02-02 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:20:14PM -0500, John Levine wrote: > In the past few days I've seen a lot of spam from gmail, sleazy SEO > and the like. Has someone cracked their signup system? About 20% of the UCE and spam that reaches my customers' INBOXES is from outlook.com or gmail.com.

Re: [mailop] Lots of spam from gmail ?

2018-02-03 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:03:23AM +, Michael Wise wrote: > > > For, “smaller players” the best way is to submit the traffic thru SpamCop. > > We get a feed from them, and it’s one more drop in the bucket … but the > buckets are looked at by a human. Could you please add a header for

Re: [mailop] New server email being treated as spam by Google

2020-11-19 Thread Rob Kendrick via mailop
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:21:19AM +, Paul Waring via mailop wrote: > Before I change any more settings, I was wondering if there was a time > period during which Google treats a new server that it hasn't seen > before as a spam source? If this is something that will go away after a > few more

Re: [mailop] Dear Sendinblue (IBM)... please stop.

2021-06-03 Thread Rob Kendrick via mailop
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 06:30:57PM +0200, Simon Bressier via mailop wrote: > > I'm really sorry to hear that you are receiving such crap from our > platform, could you please provide me more details offlist regarding such > sending ? I gave up reporting abuse to Sendinblue 18 months ago. It was

Re: [mailop] OVH Strasbourg suffers major fire

2021-03-10 Thread Rob Kendrick via mailop
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:40:26AM +, Graeme Fowler via mailop wrote: > From a mailop perspective, whilst this may seem a bit dark, I’d be interested > to see whether this creates a (however brief!) downturn in hostility, spam > and scams. Surely everyone drops every packet from OVH long

Re: [mailop] OVH Strasbourg suffers major fire

2021-03-10 Thread Rob Kendrick via mailop
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 09:51:20AM +, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Rob Kendrick via mailop wrote: > >I'm glad that everyone is safe, but I retract my normal opinion that OVH > >should get in the sea, as that might extinguish the fire. > > A

Re: [mailop] Authentication Bounces by Gmail

2023-09-13 Thread Rob Kendrick via mailop
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > I'm sure I've had a long explanation on here in the past year, but the > short answer is if the message is not DKIM valid and you're forwarding, you > should rewrite > the MAIL FROM to a domain you own that will SPF authn

Re: [mailop] R: Contact in Microsoft 365 Defender for Outlook?

2023-10-23 Thread Rob Kendrick via mailop
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:18:31AM +, Rodolfo Saccani via mailop wrote: > > I wander what the review process looks like. They'll recommend that you use their URL checking service instead. B. ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] Debt Collection Client Email Servers

2024-03-25 Thread Rob Kendrick via mailop
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:47:11PM +, Michael Irvine via mailop wrote: > The problem I am trying to fix is that these are legal emails and I > need a way to signal that to the providers. With many states and USA > government stating that email is a legal form of communication, how > can we