Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-06 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:52 PM, G. Miliotis wrote: > On 6/4/2016 20:27, Vick Khera wrote: > >> I use google groups for those things. You can have as many of those as >> you like, and they can be configured as shared mailboxes or even a simple >> ticketing system. >> >

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-06 Thread G. Miliotis
On 6/4/2016 20:27, Vick Khera wrote: I use google groups for those things. You can have as many of those as you like, and they can be configured as shared mailboxes or even a simple ticketing system. Jut noting that I have done this and the spam controls for google groups are not the best. You

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
Well, free edition should be limited to 5 accounts, but yeah, $300/year is pricey for consumers, no doubt about that. And I wouldn't call Gmail hobbled, it's just more similar to the consumer version, doesn't add the bells & whistles of the paid version. Though, when you're used to running your

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Dave Warren
I have the old one with 50 accounts. And "hobbled" might be a bit of an exaggeration, but I do run my own servers and I am used to having all sorts of flexibility :) However, hobbled feels right since the features already exist, they're just... well... -- Dave Warren

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-05 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
I've tried to make the argument before, I can ping the thread again, but I wouldn't bet on it. I'd probably get the consumer version out first, we'll have to make sure that works with free apps domains as well. I know I'm paying for full Google apps for my personal domain after missing too many

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 2016-04-02 at 09:58 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote: > Is this another one of those fun DNSSEC issues? I'm not particularly > good at reading these, but it looks like the PTR lookup is denied > existence at 136.in-addr.arpa. >

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
details.aspx?id=18275> ? > > > > *From:* Brandon Long [mailto:bl...@google.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2016 4:45 PM > *To:* Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* Pascal Herbert <pascal.herb...@gmail.com>; m...@pixelgate.net; > mailop@mailop.org > > *

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
ed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool > <http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? > > > > *From:* mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] *On Behalf Of *Pascal > Herbert > *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2016 2:45 PM > *To:* m...@pixelgat

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Pascal Herbert
Forgot to mention that. The server only uses ipv4. No ipv6. Pascal On Apr 1, 2016 23:42, "Mark Milhollan" wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Pascal Herbert wrote: > > >Google is currently rejecting mails from some of our servers with: > >The IP address sending this message does

Re: [mailop] Gmail rate limit

2016-04-01 Thread Michael Wise
Always best with such questions if you just come right out and say what the IP is and what you think the rDNS is. Because sooner or later, we’re gonna require that in order to help you. So putting it in the original post is … a really good idea, IMHO. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise |