Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-16 Thread Laura Atkins
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Eric Henson wrote: > > Rathbun posted ticket#  <>SRX1354825893ID in his original email, so…not > directed at him, I’m guessing. Not at all. I didn’t even see who posted the original request. I’ve got to admit, I tend to glaze over the public

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Wise via mailop
15, 2016 4:18 PM To: Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> Cc: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation? Wait. You mean we’re supposed to open a ticket? Not just randomly post vague words to a mailing list and expect everything to be f

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Wise via mailop
16 4:55 PM To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation? On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 23:43:13 +, Eric Henson <ehen...@pfsweb.com> wrote: >Rathbun posted ticket# SRX1354825893ID in his original email, so…not directed >at him, I’m guessing. Good

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Rathbun
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 23:43:13 +, Eric Henson wrote: >Rathbun posted ticket# SRX1354825893ID in his original email, so…not directed >at him, I’m guessing. Goodness, yes. The participants have been co-belligerents for way far too long. mdr -- Fail-safe systems fail by

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Eric Henson
Rathbun posted ticket# SRX1354825893ID in his original email, so…not directed at him, I’m guessing. From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Laura Atkins Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 6:18 PM To: Michael Wise Cc: mailop Subject: Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Laura Atkins
k/?LinkID=614866>? > > From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Jaren Angerbauer > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 3:40 PM > To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> > Subject: Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation? > > Might also help, if using ce

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Rathbun
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:39:33 -0600, Jaren Angerbauer wrote: >Might also help, if using ceremonial smoke, to make sure and use the four >representative smoke colors in the Microsoft logo. A profound observation. I confess that I never considered that aspect. A

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Wise via mailop
Angerbauer Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 3:40 PM To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation? Might also help, if using ceremonial smoke, to make sure and use the four representative smoke colors in the Microsoft logo. --Jaren On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at

Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Wise via mailop
:( /Hmm... Replying to Mr. Rathbun offline. But as an aside, if one does reply to the "Mitigation Decision" emails and one doesn't get a response within 24 hours ... one should reply again, because that's an indication of the request being out of SLA, and there may be some other issues.