Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers' meeting Agenda (10th Jan, 2018)

2018-01-10 Thread Jeff Darcy
FYI, the crash that Kaleb mentioned looks like this, so I think Nithya was right that it's a bug in shutdown. Better than memory corruption, which is what I tend to think of when I hear about random crashes. https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/8304/consoleFull #0 0x7ff603ce1495

[Gluster-Maintainers] Merging patches

2017-11-07 Thread Jeff Darcy
There's nothing like starting the day with a good rant. As I'm sure many of you know, I'm the project's most active committer. I'm certainly not the most active *reviewer*. There are several other candidates for that; my money's on Niels. I'm even further from being the most active *author*.

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] RFC: Suggestions on patches taking more than 10 tries

2017-10-31 Thread Jeff Darcy
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017, at 01:01 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > In this case, I suggest maintainers can send a message to author, and > send an updated patch with their suggestion (with making sure '-- > author' is set to original author). This can save both the effort of > review, and also heart

[Gluster-Maintainers] Coding standard and clang format

2017-10-13 Thread Jeff Darcy
I think we're almost done with the new coding standard. The only objections on the last round were formatting issues, and the couple of rounds before that weren't very controversial either. I'm sure there are many other things we could add to help our fellow developers. I've seen many of you

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Reminder: Maintainers meeting tomorrow: Agenda

2017-10-03 Thread Jeff Darcy
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017, at 08:33 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Meeting date: 10/04/2017 (Oct 4th) > BJ Link > * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 11:00 UTC? ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org

[Gluster-Maintainers] Patch-etiquette reminder

2017-08-31 Thread Jeff Darcy
I've seen a few patches lately that were merged before affected parties in other timezones had a chance to see them (or see them in their current form). In at least one case, a patch wasn't even reviewed by *anyone* other than its author before being merged. I'd like to discourage this. Yes,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] 4.0 discussions: Need time slots

2017-07-31 Thread Jeff Darcy
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 03:06 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Tuesday (1st Aug) - 8:30pm-9:30pm IST (11am - 12pm EDT). > Wednesday (2nd Aug) - 5pm - 6pm IST (7:30am - 8:30am EDT) > Wednesday (2nd Aug) - 7:30pm - 8:30pm IST (10am - 11am EDT) > Friday (4th Aug) - 5pm - 7pm IST (7:30am - 9:30am EDT)

[Gluster-Maintainers] New regression-analysis script

2015-11-04 Thread Jeff Darcy
I just pushed a patch that should ease the process of analyzing recent regression-test failures.     http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12510/ From the commit message: > Often a test will fail quite frequently, but not so frequently that it > will fail twice in a row for the same patch.  This