Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-06-28 Thread Amar Tumballi
All, Thanks for participating actively in the discussions. With all your co-operation we now have a update on maintainers 2.0 proposal. Vijay Bellur sent a patch last week [1] capturing all the discussions. Please go through the patch and see if you have any more concerns. There are many new

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-04-18 Thread Niels de Vos
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 04:53:55PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer > wrote: > > > Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit : > > > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the > > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-04-17 Thread Amye Scavarda
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit : > > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the > > Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad: > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-04-14 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:40:35AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit : > > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the > > Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad: > > https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe > > > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-04-14 Thread Michael Scherer
Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit : > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the > Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad: > https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe > > Feedback welcomed! > > Note that the goals of this are to expand out our

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-25 Thread Vijay Bellur
; > > Cc: "Amar Tumballi" <atumb...@redhat.com>, "GlusterFS Maintainers" < > maintainers@gluster.org>, "Gluster Devel" > > <gluster-de...@gluster.org>, "Michael Scherer" <msche...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Saturday, Ma

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-25 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
ers@gluster.org>, "Gluster Devel" > <gluster-de...@gluster.org>, "Michael Scherer" <msche...@redhat.com> > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 5:22:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal > > > > - Origin

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-25 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
luster.org>, "Gluster Devel" > <gluster-de...@gluster.org> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 7:12:32 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal > > Do we also plan to publish similar guidelines for deciding on Project > maintainer

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-24 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
Do we also plan to publish similar guidelines for deciding on Project maintainer? On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le samedi 18 mars 2017 à 16:47 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-23 Thread Michael Scherer
Le samedi 18 mars 2017 à 16:47 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a écrit : > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want > > clarity on few things: > > > > 1. Does maintainers means they are

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-18 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi > wrote: > >> I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want >> clarity on few things: >> >> 1. Does maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-18 Thread Niels de Vos
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 01:20:31AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want clarity > on few things: > > 1. Does maintainers means they are only reviewing/ merging patches? > 2. Should maintainers be responsible for answering ML / IRC

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-18 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi > wrote: > >> I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want >> clarity on few things: >> >> 1. Does maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-18 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want > clarity on few things: > > 1. Does maintainers means they are only reviewing/ merging patches? > 2. Should maintainers be responsible for answering

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-18 Thread Amar Tumballi
I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want clarity on few things: 1. Does maintainers means they are only reviewing/ merging patches? 2. Should maintainers be responsible for answering ML / IRC questions (well, they should focus more on documentation IMO). 3. Who's

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-17 Thread Amye Scavarda
Posting in line, but it may be pretty hard to follow. Apologies if I miss something. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:12:18PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-17 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:06:53PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:12:18PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle management of > > Gluster maintainers more structured. We intend to make the proposal > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

2017-03-17 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:12:18PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle management of > Gluster maintainers more structured. We intend to make the proposal > effective around 3.11 (May 2016). > > Please review the proposal and let