[Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Maintainer's meeting: 7th Jan, 2019 - Agenda

Meeting date: 2019-01-07 18:30 IST, 13:00 UTC, 08:00 EDTBJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/217609845 Attendance Agenda - Welcome 2019: Discuss about goals : -

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer's meeting: Jan 21st, 2019

BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/217609845 - Watch: https://bluejeans.com/s/PAnE5 Attendance - Nigel Babu, Amar, Nithya, Shyam, Sunny, Milind (joined late). Agenda

[Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Maintainer's meeting: 7th Jan, 2019 - Meeting minutes

2 more hours added, so full regression can be run. --- On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 9:04 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Meeting date: 2019-01-07 18:30 IST, 13:00 UTC, 08:00 EDTBJ Link > >- Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/217609845 >

[Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: Changes in Gluster Community meetings

All, We currently have 3 meetings which are public: 1. Maintainer's Meeting - Runs once in 2 weeks (on Mondays), and current attendance is around 3-5 on an avg, and not much is discussed. - Without majority attendance, we can't take any decisions too. 2. Community meeting - Supposed to happen

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Proposal: Changes in Gluster Community meetings

ing 12 hours opposed to the one you’re proposing? > > -Darrell > > On Mar 25, 2019, at 4:25 AM, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < > atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > All, > > We currently have 3 meetings which are public: > > 1. Maintainer's Meeting > > -

[Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

Hi all, We are calling out our users, and developers to contribute in validating ‘glusterfs-6.0rc’ build in their usecase. Specially for the cases of upgrade, stability, and performance. Some of the key highlights of the release are listed in release-notes draft

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Various upgrades are Broken

Thanks for testing this Hari. On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:42 PM Hari Gowtham wrote: > Hi, > > With the patch https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21838/ the > upgrade from 3.12 to 6, 4.1 to 6 and 5 to 6 is broken. > > The above patch is available in release 6 and has been back-ported to 4.1

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

Thanks to those who participated. Update at present: We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked release as pending upon them. We will keep these lists updated about progress. -Amar On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:41 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Branched and next steps

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:37 AM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > In preparation for RC0 I have put up an intial patch for the release > notes [1]. Request the following actions on the same (either a followup > patchset, or a dependent one), > > - Please review! > - Required GD2 section updated to

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points to the correct commit? On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, wrote: > Niels, Kaleb, > > We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows, > > commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < > atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points >> to the correct commit? >> >> On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

Hi Jim, On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:21 PM Jim Kinney wrote: > > Issues with glusterfs fuse mounts cause issues with python file open for > write. We have to use nfs to avoid this. > > Really want to see better back-end tools to facilitate cleaning up of > glusterfs failures. If system is going to

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

Hi Hans, Thanks for the honest feedback. Appreciate this. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:39 PM Hans Henrik Happe wrote: > Hi, > > Looking into something else I fell over this proposal. Being a shop that > are going into "Leaving GlusterFS" mode, I thought I would give my two > cents. > > While

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

Team, How can we get debug info package for suse? This helps us to debug a crash on 5.5 On Tue, 19 Mar, 2019, 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan, wrote: > On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing. > > Please try them out and report

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting minutes: Feb 04th, 2019

BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/217609845 - Watch: https://bluejeans.com/s/37SS6/ Attendance - Nigel Babu - Sunil Heggodu - Amar Tumballi - Aravinda VK - Atin Mukherjee

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Proposal: Changes in Gluster Community meetings

carve out an AI to get them fixed. <https://hackmd.io/OqZbh7gfQe6uvVUXUVKJ5g?both#RoundTable>RoundTable - ---- Regards, Amar On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:53 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Darrell, > > The new proposal is to hav

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

My take is, lets disable sdfs for 6.1 (we also have issues with its performance anyways). We will fix it properly by 6.2 or 7.0. Continue with marking sdfs-sanity.t tests as bad in that case. -Amar On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:04 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:33 AM

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-with-multiplex #1359

Got time to test subdir-mount.t failing in brick-mux scenario. I noticed some issues, where I need further help from glusterd team. subdir-mount.t expects 'hook' script to run after add-brick to make sure the required subdirectories are healed and are present in new bricks. This is important as

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 7: Gentle Reminder, Regression health for release-6.next and release-7

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:07 PM Rinku Kothiya wrote: > Hi Team, > > We need to branch for release-7, but nightly builds failures are blocking > this activity. Please find test failures and respective test links below : > > The top tests that are failing are as below and need attention, > > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: experimental-periodic #631

Nope. It was requested at a time when there were many features we were trying to develop, at same time. It was done to reduce the possible merge conflicts earlier. Currently, experimental is not having any new features. I will also consider removing the 'branch' altogether from glusterfs repo (it

[Gluster-Maintainers] [Announcement] Gluster Community Update

Hello Gluster community, Today marks a new day in the 26-year history of Red Hat. IBM has finalized its acquisition of Red Hat , which will operate as a distinct

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:10 AM Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:36:30PM +0530, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna > Murthy wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian wrote: > > > > > > Comparing the changes between revisions is something > > > that GitHub does not