[Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #1787

2016-09-30 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [Niels de Vos] gfapi: redesign the public interface for upcall consumers -- [...truncated 18114 lines...] ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-862967.t - 16 second

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Disable experimental features in Release-3.9

2016-09-30 Thread Niels de Vos
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:29:30AM +0530, Aravinda wrote: > Hi, > > Following features are not ready or not planned for 3.9 release. Do we have > any option to disable these features using ./configure options in > release-3.9 branch or we need to revert all the patches related to the > feature. >

[Gluster-Maintainers] Jenkins build is back to normal : regression-test-burn-in #1788

2016-09-30 Thread jenkins
See ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Jenkins build is back to normal : regression-test-burn-in #1786

2016-09-30 Thread jenkins
See ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

2016-09-30 Thread Nigel Babu
If you want it to happen automatically, it's next to impossible. We'll need to fork Gerrit to make those changes. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Manikandan Selvaganesh < manikandancs...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, Pranith. I prefer adding everyone's name(who reviewed any patch set > despite the

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

2016-09-30 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:11:51AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, > At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the > final version of the patch. But for most of the patches, different people > would spend time on different versions making the patch better,

[Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

2016-09-30 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
hi, At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the final version of the patch. But for most of the patches, different people would spend time on different versions making the patch better, they may not get time to do the review for every version of the patch. Is it

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

2016-09-30 Thread Manikandan Selvaganesh
+1, Pranith. I prefer adding everyone's name(who reviewed any patch set despite the latest patch set) in the 'Reviewed-by' tag. On Sep 30, 2016 6:02 PM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" wrote: > hi, > At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the > final

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

2016-09-30 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 08:50:12PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: > On 09/30/2016 06:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:11:51AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: ... > > Maybe we can add an additional tag that mentions all the people that > > did do reviews of older

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

2016-09-30 Thread Ravishankar N
On 09/30/2016 06:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:11:51AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the final version of the patch. But for most of the patches, different people would spend time on

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS-3.7.16 release approaching

2016-09-30 Thread Niels de Vos
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:08:42PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > Hi all, > > GlusterFS-3.7.16 is on target to be released on Sep 30, 4 days from now. > > In preparation for the release, maintainers please stop merging > anymore changes into release-3.7. > If any developer has a change that needs to