[Gluster-Maintainers] Fwd: Features for Gluster 3.8

Forwarded Message Subject: Features for Gluster 3.8 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:49:11 +0530 From: Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> To: Gluster Devel <gluster-de...@gluster.org> Hi All, If you are working on a feature to be included in Gluster 3.8, can you please list it in

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Need someone to guide todays Bug Triage Meeting

On Tuesday 22 September 2015 12:12 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: Hi! I'm taking today off and will not be online for most of the time. Could someone please take care of the weekly Bug Triage Meeting at 12:00 UTC? https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-bug-triage Thanks, Niels. We have bugs

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Jenkins build is back to normal : regression-test-burn-in #43

On 12/08/2015 07:30 PM, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: See ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers Looks like regression

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #203

On 01/05/2016 09:07 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 01/05/2016 04:55 PM, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: See <http://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-burn-in/203/> ++ ls /build/install/cores/core.9754 + CORELIST=/build/install/cores/core.9754 + for corefile in '$CO

[Gluster-Maintainers] 3.8 Plan changes - proposal

Hi All, I am considering the following changes for 3.8: 1. Include 4.0 features such as NSR, dht2, glusterd2.0 & eventing as experimental features in 3.8. 4.0 features are shaping up reasonably well and it would be nice to have them packaged in 3.8 so that we can get more meaningful feedback

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #203

On 01/05/2016 04:55 PM, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: See ++ ls /build/install/cores/core.9754 + CORELIST=/build/install/cores/core.9754 + for corefile in '$CORELIST' + getliblistfromcore /build/install/cores/core.9754 + rm -f

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > Since we do not have any objections to this proposal, let us do the > following for 3.7.12: > > 1. Treat June 1st as the cut-off for patch acceptance in release-3.7. > 2. I will tag 3.7.12rc1 on June 2

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > Discovered two regression issues in Geo-rep, identified the fix and patch > posted to master and release-3.7. Waiting for regression tests run. > > Is it possible to take these patches for 3.7.12? Sure, I will

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:55:58PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Since we do not have any objectio

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] I am seeing nokia folks to be active in the community

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > I think it will be great if we get these people up to speed. I have seen how > they were helpful without any help from us (They found/fixed 2 memory > leaks). I think it is high time

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release Management Process change - proposal

June 9th after we have all acks in place. Thanks! Vijay On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Aravinda <avish...@redhat.com> wrote: >> +1 from Geo-rep. >> >> Will explicit ack to be don

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] 3.8 Plan changes - proposal

On 01/07/2016 12:24 PM, Shyam wrote: On 01/06/2016 09:44 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Hi All, I am considering the following changes for 3.8: 1. Include 4.0 features such as NSR, dht2, glusterd2.0 & eventing as experimental features in 3.8. 4.0 features are shaping up reasonably well and it w

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Need new manager for 3.7.9

On 02/24/2016 07:20 AM, Kaushal M wrote: Hi All. Raghavendra had volunteered to be the release manager last week. But unfortunately, he cannot find enough time in the next couple of weeks (because of other work commitments) to perform the manager tasks. So we now need a volunteer to be the new

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Need new manager for 3.7.9

On 02/24/2016 08:50 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: On Feb 24, 2016 7:01 PM, "Vijay Bellur" <vbel...@redhat.com <mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 02/24/2016 07:20 AM, Kaushal M wrote: >> >> Hi All. >> >> Raghavendra

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Need new manager for 3.7.9

On 02/24/2016 07:45 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 02/24/2016 08:50 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: On Feb 24, 2016 7:01 PM, "Vijay Bellur" <vbel...@redhat.com <mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 02/24/2016 07:20 AM, Kaushal M wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Update on 3.7.9 release plans

On 03/03/2016 01:26 AM, Kaushal M wrote: Hey Vijay, Could you give an update on your plans for the 3.7.9 release? The release (at least tagging) was supposed to happen earlier this week, but didn't as you were sick. Can you pick up the release efforts now? If not, we can try to get another

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Please do not merge patches that have topic 'rfc'

On 03/28/2016 06:36 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:57:03AM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: Should we have a smoke check that marks a change with `rfc` as the topic '-1 (something)'? This would prevent such changes from being merged. We could, but I hope we do not need it. But if

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainership

Hi All, We are evolving guidelines for managing maintainer lifecycle and will be sharing the document here soon. Let us adhere to the new process outlined there for all changes to MAINTAINERS going forward. Thanks! Vijay On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Saravanakumar Arumugam

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

Hi All, We are blocked on 3.7.12 owing to this proposal. Appreciate any feedback on this! Thanks, Vijay On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases. The >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for gluster/glusterfs

On 07/21/2016 10:43 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:20:12AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: Vijay, I've fwd'd the original report. Could you add this list on the receipients of the run? gluster

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for gluster/glusterfs

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Vijay, I've fwd'd the original report. Could you add this list on the > receipients of the run? > gluster-devel is already configured to receive the coverity scan report. Do we need this report on maintainers also?

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #1376

Failure in /tests/basic/ec/ec.t. Pranith/Xavi - can you please take a look? Thanks, Vijay On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [Aravinda VK] eventsapi: Fix make install

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Events API - Help required to identify the list of Events from each component

On 07/13/2016 10:23 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, We are working on Eventing feature for Gluster, Sent feature patch for the same. Design: http://review.gluster.org/13115 Patch: http://review.gluster.org/14248 Demo: http://aravindavk.in/blog/10-mins-intro-to-gluster-eventing Following document

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > Following are the patches that need to go in 3.7.12. Can you please merge > them? > > Quota: > http://review.gluster.org/14659/ > http://review.gluster.org/14727/ > > dht: >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #1623

tests/bugs/cli/bug-1320388.t is failing quite frequently in regression-test burn in. Can you please take a look in? Thx, Vijay On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:33 AM, wrote: > See > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:18:14AM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/10/2016 11:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/10/2016 10:21 AM, Vija

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: > Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which quota.conf > is regenerated to the later version. It works properly. And as Pranith said, > both enabling/disabling takes a lot of time to

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > > Cc: "Amar Tumballi" , "GlusterFS

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi > wrote: > >> I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want >> clarity on few things: >> >> 1. Does maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.10.0 released

Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.10.0 > released > To: Humble Chirammal <hchir...@redhat.com>, Vijay Bellur < > vbel...@redhat.com>, "de Vos, Niels" <nde...@redhat.com> > Cc: maintainers@gluster.org, packag...@gluster.org > > > I am testing these bu

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.10.0 released

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Niels de Vos <ni...@nixpanic.net> wrote: > On Tue Mar 14 23:23:22 2017 GMT+0100, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > Any update on this one? We still have 3.8 and 3.9 images in docker hub. > > 3.8 should probably stay and get updated on regular basis, 3.

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer Meeting notes and AIs - 5th Apr

Hey All, We had a good discussion in last week's maintainers meeting. Meeting notes can be found at [1] and the recording is available at [2]. We have the following AIs from last meeting: a> All maintainers to publish backlog in github issues [3] by next meeting (4/19). b> Publish 4.0 proposal

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #2734

Hey All, A patch [1] that I pushed to master on behalf of Shreyas has caused our regression burn-in tests to fail over the weekend. There is another patch from Shreyas [2] that fixes the problem and is currently awaiting votes from CentOS & NetBSD regressions. My bad that we did not end up

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] 4.0 discussions: Need time slots

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 03:06 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Tuesday (1st Aug) - 8:30pm-9:30pm IST (11am - 12pm EDT). > Wednesday (2nd Aug) - 5pm - 6pm IST (7:30am - 8:30am EDT) > Wednesday (2nd Aug) - 7:30pm - 8:30pm IST

[Gluster-Maintainers] No meeting this week

Hi All, Most maintainers from Red Hat are busy today and will not be able to attend the maintainers' meeting. Let us cancel the meeting today and re-group in 2 weeks. Thanks! Viajy ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org

[Gluster-Maintainers] No meeting today

Hey All, A few of us are attending Red Hat Summit and hence there will be no meeting today. Talk to you all in 2 weeks. Thanks, Vijay ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] proposal on few changes in regression voting to keep upstream 'master' fast moving

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > All, > > NOTE: Currently sent to only maintainers list, planning to send it to > 'gluster-devel@' by Wednesday (24th) if there are no serious comments. > > Below is mainly a proposal, and I would like to hear people's

[Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting Minutes - 5/31

Hey All, Please find notes from the meeting on 5/31 at [1]. We are looking to send across the revised list of maintainers [2] by 5th of June. Please review the document and send any feedback to Amar by then. Thanks, Vijay [1]

[Gluster-Maintainers] Vijay unavailable from 19th - 26th Jun 2017

I will have limited access to email in this period. Thanks, Vijay ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers' meeting tomorrow

Hi All, I will not be able to host the meeting tomorrow. Would anyone be willing to run the meeting tomorrow? A few regular attendees from Red Hat are also busy with internal meetings this week - so might not be a bad idea to cancel this instance. Thanks, Vijay

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster 4.0 release: Update from maintainers meeting

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hey Ants, > > Below is the message we want to get out from ant colony to users and > developer community this week. (Was pending AI on me since 2 weeks). I want > each of you to review this and give a Ack/No Ack on

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Client Server incompatibility with Gluster 4.0

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Was (Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposed Protocol changes for 4.0: Need feedback.) > > All, > > While we are at making all the below tasks' color coding to GREEN, it > would make sense to discuss 1 main thing. > > With 4.0, we

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Update: Gerrit review system has one more command now

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi all, > > As a push towards more flexibility to our developers, and options to run > more tests without too much effort, we are moving towards more and more > options to trigger tests from Gerrit during reviews. > >

[Gluster-Maintainers] Reducing technical debt

Hey All, While trying to review an upstream patch, I noticed that a single function has almost grown to 1k LOC :-). I found it unwieldy from a readability perspective and problems of that nature could be a major deterrent for anybody to contribute code in such areas. I am inclined to believe that

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer's meeting series

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:08 AM Nigel Babu wrote: > I propose that we alternate times for every other meeting so that we can > accommodate people across all timezones. We're never going to find one > single timezone that works for everyone. The next best compromise that I've > seen projects make

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Making it happen!

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:27 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 01/10/2018 01:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 4.0 branching date is slated on the 16th of Jan 2018 and release is > > slated for the end of Feb (28th), 2018. > > This is today! So read on... > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2018 07:04 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > > > > On 03/14/2018 02:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Kal

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 03/12/2018 02:32 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > On 03/12/2018 10:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> * > >> > >> After 4.1, we want to move to either continuous numbering (like > >> Fedora),

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:44 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme >>> of the releases,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Requesting for an early 5.6 release

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:48 PM Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > We had a critical bug [1], that got introduced in gluster release 5. There > are users waiting on an update with the fix. Hence requesting for an out of > band release for 5.6. Myself and jiffin, volunteer to do some tasks of

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

Thank you for the reproducer! Can you please let us know the output of `gluster volume info`? Regards, Vijay On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:53 PM Jim Kinney wrote: > This python will fail when writing to a file in a glusterfs fuse mounted > directory. > > import mmap > > # write a simple example

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

brick/brick > Options Reconfigured: > performance.client-io-threads: off > storage.build-pgfid: on > cluster.self-heal-daemon: enable > performance.readdir-ahead: off > nfs.disable: off > > > There are 11 other volumes and all are similar. > > > On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 13:59 -0700

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:20 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I am not sure how BZ 1683815 > can be a blocker at > RC. We have a fix ready, but to me it doesn't look like a blocker. Vijay - > any objections? > None from me as it is an existing

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:12 AM Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi developers, > > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around > this topic. > > We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which > follow complete github workflow, where as there are few,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing Gluster release 7.4

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 2:53 PM Artem Russakovskii wrote: > Typo here:"cashes" > #1785323: glusterfsd cashes after a few seconds > Thank you for catching that. I have opened a pull request [1] to address a couple of typos in the release notes. Cheers, Vijay [1]