Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-11-22 Thread Niels de Vos
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:46:39AM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: > Hi Niels, > > Can we have this in the next 3.8 build. Without this fix, bricks and snapd > are susceptible to be down. Thanks. Yes, I am planning to do a 3.8.6 build last week and want to include this change. Things are rather busy

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-11-20 Thread Avra Sengupta
Hi Niels, Can we have this in the next 3.8 build. Without this fix, bricks and snapd are susceptible to be down. Thanks. Regards, Avra On 11/15/2016 11:46 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi Niels, I don't think there is anything more to add to the release note, in regards to this patch

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-11-14 Thread Avra Sengupta
Hi Niels, I don't think there is anything more to add to the release note, in regards to this patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15308/). Given that it is a crucial fix, I think we should take this in without further delay. Thanks. Regards, Avra On 09/19/2016 03:07 PM, Niels de Vos

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-09-19 Thread Niels de Vos
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:43:29PM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: > Problem: glusterd used to assume that the brick port which was previously > allocated to a brick, would still be available, and in doing so would reuse > the port for the brick without registering with the port map server. The > port

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-09-19 Thread Niels de Vos
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:56:10PM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: > On 09/07/2016 08:33 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > Hi Avra, > > > > http://review.gluster.org/15308 is one of your patches, and this changes > > the allocation of ports used. It seems to address a real problem, so it > > is acceptible

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-09-12 Thread Avra Sengupta
On 09/07/2016 08:33 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: Hi Avra, http://review.gluster.org/15308 is one of your patches, and this changes the allocation of ports used. It seems to address a real problem, so it is acceptible to include it in 3.8. Because it is a user facing change (different ports), we

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-09-07 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wednesday 7 September 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Just wondering, is it going to be something more than the aggregation of >> BZ descriptions? Do you think it is better to

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-09-07 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Wednesday 7 September 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > Just wondering, is it going to be something more than the aggregation of > BZ descriptions? Do you think it is better to callout just some BZs which > are user facing compared to the normal aggregation? > IMHO,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

2016-09-07 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
Just wondering, is it going to be something more than the aggregation of BZ descriptions? Do you think it is better to callout just some BZs which are user facing compared to the normal aggregation? On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi Avra, > >