Dear Christian,
On 29.07.2010 20:37:25, Christian Ebert wrote:
Searching for non-ascii words is bound to fail in most cases,
e.g. in an utf-8 environment (query in utf-8, target messages
mostly e.g. in iso-8859-1).
Any chances that this will be implemented?
the 8-bit-only issue is a r
On Thu, Jul 29 2010, Christian Ebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Searching for non-ascii words is bound to fail in most cases,
> e.g. in an utf-8 environment (query in utf-8, target messages
> mostly e.g. in iso-8859-1).
>
> Any chances that this will be implemented?
I'm not much of a programmer, but I woul
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:37:25PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Searching for non-ascii words is bound to fail in most cases,
> e.g. in an utf-8 environment (query in utf-8, target messages
> mostly e.g. in iso-8859-1).
>
I agree.
> Any chances that this will be implemented?
Indexin
Hi,
Searching for non-ascii words is bound to fail in most cases,
e.g. in an utf-8 environment (query in utf-8, target messages
mostly e.g. in iso-8859-1).
Any chances that this will be implemented?
For the time being and the benefit of others in the same
situation, here's my workaround:
#!/bi
